On 06/10/2015 12:39, Jo Rhett wrote:
Sorry, let me restate: I know consequences of blocking large
providers. I’m asking if others have found the same to be true, or if
there is any reason to give SoftLayer benefit of the doubt?
Once in a great while this kind of query generates clueful contact
Am 06.10.2015 um 04:39 schrieb Jo Rhett:
On Oct 5, 2015, at 7:36 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 06.10.2015 um 04:33 schrieb Jo Rhett:
Looking at my spam block statistics, not a single IP I’ve reported to
SoftLayer over the last two years has been shut down. Is there any
reason I shouldn’t just
On Oct 5, 2015, at 7:36 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 06.10.2015 um 04:33 schrieb Jo Rhett:
>> Looking at my spam block statistics, not a single IP I’ve reported to
>> SoftLayer over the last two years has been shut down. Is there any
>> reason I shouldn’t just block all their allocations and save
Am 06.10.2015 um 04:33 schrieb Jo Rhett:
Looking at my spam block statistics, not a single IP I’ve reported to
SoftLayer over the last two years has been shut down. Is there any
reason I shouldn’t just block all their allocations and save myself some
effort?
if it's your personal mail only -
Looking at my spam block statistics, not a single IP I’ve reported to SoftLayer
over the last two years has been shut down. Is there any reason I shouldn’t
just block all their allocations and save myself some effort?
--
Jo Rhett
Net Consonance : net philanthropy to improve open source and inte
