Re: Heads up: Net::DNS update may have quietly broken your SpamAssassin.

2015-09-20 Thread Jonathan Nichols
> > Your problem is URIBL_BLOCKED. The usual cause of this is running a mail > system that relies on a public-access DNS resolver, although if you have > substantial volume on your system you can have this happen with your own DNS > infrastructure. See http://uribl.com/refused.shtml for detail

Re: Heads up: Net::DNS update may have quietly broken your SpamAssassin.

2015-09-20 Thread Bill Cole
On 20 Sep 2015, at 13:11, Benny Pedersen wrote: Jonathan Nichols skrev den 2015-09-20 18:57: URIBL scores have dropped to almost nothing. X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=6.084 tagged_above=-999 required=5.31 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, BOTNET=2.4, BOTNET_NORDNS=0.3, PYZOR_CHECK=1.392, RDNS_NONE=0.793, S

Re: Heads up: Net::DNS update may have quietly broken your SpamAssassin.

2015-09-20 Thread Bill Cole
On 20 Sep 2015, at 12:57, Jonathan Nichols wrote: On Sep 18, 2015, at 12:41 AM, Bill Cole wrote: nd after many hours of trying to determine why which included reviewing BIND configs and packet captures and dissection, I nailed it down to SA making DNS queries without the "recursion desired"

Re: Heads up: Net::DNS update may have quietly broken your SpamAssassin.

2015-09-20 Thread Benny Pedersen
Jonathan Nichols skrev den 2015-09-20 18:57: URIBL scores have dropped to almost nothing. X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=6.084 tagged_above=-999 required=5.31 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, BOTNET=2.4, BOTNET_NORDNS=0.3, PYZOR_CHECK=1.392, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SAGREY=0.4, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UR

Re: Heads up: Net::DNS update may have quietly broken your SpamAssassin.

2015-09-20 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 20.09.2015 um 18:57 schrieb Jonathan Nichols: On Sep 18, 2015, at 12:41 AM, Bill Cole wrote: nd after many hours of trying to determine why which included reviewing BIND configs and packet captures and dissection, I nailed it down to SA making DNS queries without the "recursion desire

Re: Heads up: Net::DNS update may have quietly broken your SpamAssassin.

2015-09-20 Thread Jonathan Nichols
> On Sep 18, 2015, at 12:41 AM, Bill Cole > wrote: > > nd after many hours of trying to determine why which included reviewing BIND > configs and packet captures and dissection, I nailed it down to SA making DNS > queries without the "recursion desired" flag. Since my local nameservers > isn

Re: best way to whitelist this list?

2015-09-20 Thread A. Schulze
Am 20.09.2015 um 05:10 schrieb Reindl Harald: Am 19.09.2015 um 20:12 schrieb A. Schulze: So I ask the list: (how) do you whitelist this list? whitelist_auth *@spamassassin.apache.org works. it trigger USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST=-100 thanks! Andreas

Re: Help with RegEx Rule

2015-09-20 Thread AK
On 20/09/15 03:07, Dave Funk wrote: Final note; now that we've discussed this spam sign, it will probably become useless as spammers follow this list and mutate their crap accordingly to dodge our rules. ;( Awesome notes, Dave, thanks. The tutorial really helped and it's all been added to