Re: Return Path (TM) whitelists

2015-07-09 Thread Dianne Skoll
On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 07:58:39 +1000 Noel Butler wrote: > +1 I'll throw my +1 in on this also. Almost by definition, the kinds of organizations who buy into these certifications to get their mail delivered are unlikely to be the kinds of organizations I want to hear from. Just as SPF "pass" is a

Re: Return Path (TM) whitelists

2015-07-09 Thread Noel Butler
On 10/07/2015 02:02, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > I just got in my inbox what I consider spam from the Belgian domain > selling Japanese copiers & printers (you probably know which one). What > made it pass through SA were RCVD_IN_RP_CERTIFIED and RCVD_IN_RP_SAFE. > Together they account for a whopp

Re: Return Path (TM) whitelists

2015-07-09 Thread Greg Troxel
Ian Zimmerman writes: > I just got in my inbox what I consider spam from the Belgian domain > selling Japanese copiers & printers (you probably know which one). What > made it pass through SA were RCVD_IN_RP_CERTIFIED and RCVD_IN_RP_SAFE. > Together they account for a whopping -5 points - a poi

Re: Return Path (TM) whitelists

2015-07-09 Thread David Jones
>On 2015-07-09 16:58 +, David Jones wrote: >> Did the email have a valid unsubscribe link/process? >It is in Dutch, and I can't read Dutch. >(Yes, I do use the language plugin.) >> I shortcircuit as ham for these two rule hits and never have had a >> report of spam that couldn't be reliably/

Re: Return Path (TM) whitelists

2015-07-09 Thread Ian Zimmerman
On 2015-07-09 16:58 +, David Jones wrote: > Did the email have a valid unsubscribe link/process? It is in Dutch, and I can't read Dutch. (Yes, I do use the language plugin.) > I shortcircuit as ham for these two rule hits and never have had a > report of spam that couldn't be reliably/safely

Re: Return Path (TM) whitelists

2015-07-09 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
I just got in my inbox what I consider spam from the Belgian domain selling Japanese copiers & printers (you probably know which one). What made it pass through SA were RCVD_IN_RP_CERTIFIED and RCVD_IN_RP_SAFE. Together they account for a whopping -5 points - a poison antidote pill! Isn't that a

Re: Return Path (TM) whitelists

2015-07-09 Thread David Jones
>From: Ian Zimmerman >Sent: Thursday, July 9, 2015 11:02 AM >To: users@spamassassin.apache.org >Subject: Return Path (TM) whitelists >I just got in my inbox what I consider spam from the Belgian domain >selling Japanese copiers & printers (you probably know which one). What >made it pass through

Return Path (TM) whitelists

2015-07-09 Thread Ian Zimmerman
I just got in my inbox what I consider spam from the Belgian domain selling Japanese copiers & printers (you probably know which one). What made it pass through SA were RCVD_IN_RP_CERTIFIED and RCVD_IN_RP_SAFE. Together they account for a whopping -5 points - a poison antidote pill! Isn't that a b