Charles Sprickman wrote:
> So apparently my pre-spamassassin filtering is keeping all the best spam
> away from spamassassin.
If you have pre-spamassassin filtering that is already classifying
message as spam then consider feeing those spam messages to
spamassassin's "sa-learn --spam" for Bayes tr
Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 29.06.2015 um 01:14 schrieb Charles Sprickman:
>> If I run sa-learn and ask it to dump some info, that works:
>>
>> [root@spam-b /usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin]# sa-learn
>> --username=sp...@bway.net --dump magic
>> 0.000 0 3 0 non-toke
On 6/29/2015 1:37 PM, jdow wrote:
Ted, there is one ISP who insisted on blocking all emails sent from my
system because the internal network is "odd". It's not
"localhost.localdomain" or whatever it was they were looking for. And it
appears on my email headers. They decided "wizardess.wiz" is a
On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, ch...@antennex.com wrote:
Untested:
* ^Received: .*from [^ ]*\.in\.net[ ]
* ^From: .*\.in\.net[>$]
* ^Return-Path: .*\.in\.net>
* ^Message-ID: .*\.in\.net>
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
Warmest regards,
Mark Chino
--
ch...@antennex.com
www.antennex.com
From: John Hardin
Date: 2015-06-29 17:33
To: ch...@antennex.com
CC: USERS-SPAMASSASSIN
Subject: Re: Re: India spam
On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, ch...@antennex.com wrote:
> Here's would be type examples:
> a...@baloney.in.net
> d...
On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, ch...@antennex.com wrote:
Here's would be type examples:
a...@baloney.in.net
d...@nogood.in.net
d...@fake.in.net
and on and on.
I've looked up some of the domains used which are not as obvious as my examples
and they don't exist. The IPs may be OK and don't want to use
Ted, there is one ISP who insisted on blocking all emails sent from my system
because the internal network is "odd". It's not "localhost.localdomain" or
whatever it was they were looking for. And it appears on my email headers. They
decided "wizardess.wiz" is an illegal domain so the email from
From: John Hardin
Date: 2015-06-29 14:39
To: ch...@antennex.com
CC: SpamAssassin Users List
Subject: Re: Re: India spam
Keep replies on-list, please.
On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, ch...@antennex.com wrote:
>>
>>> How can I format a recipe that will catch the ".in.net" portion of an
>>> IP as many domain
Keep replies on-list, please.
On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, ch...@antennex.com wrote:
How can I format a recipe that will catch the ".in.net" portion of an
IP as many domain names are used in front of that domain bit?
Where do you want to look for that? In the sender's email address? In
URLs embedde
From: Axb
Date: 2015-06-29 14:04
To: users
Subject: Re: India spam
On 29.06.2015 18:42, ch...@antennex.com wrote:
> Hello, this is my first time on the list and would appreciate some
> help on a recipe. This may have been answered already as I can't
> imagine others not experiencing a similar
On 29.06.2015 18:42, ch...@antennex.com wrote:
Hello, this is my first time on the list and would appreciate some
help on a recipe. This may have been answered already as I can't
imagine others not experiencing a similar issue. I've searched google
but haven't found the searchable spamassassin li
On 27 Jun 2015, at 18:00, Jo Rhett wrote:
In the meantime, is there a mail client for Yosemite which does work?
I can't guarantee you'll be comfortable with it, but MailMate is surely
worth a look if you don't mind paying for a piece of well-supported
software.
Am 29.06.2015 um 20:00 schrieb Ted Mittelstaedt:
I have users who sometimes want to receive mail from a system in an RBL.
It's their mailbox, they are paying for it. Why should I not let them
do it?
these are corporate customers getting mail from other corporate
customers who are completely cl
On 6/29/2015 10:39 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 29.06.2015 um 19:28 schrieb Ted Mittelstaedt:
The days of squeezing every last CPU cycle out of something are
long, gone Reindl.
nonsense
I really appreciate that your bound and determined to keep that
80486 server running but nobody else is
Am 29.06.2015 um 19:34 schrieb Ted Mittelstaedt:
My objection isn't to Postfix. My objection is to assuming that
Postfix is the one and only way to do something.
If you have an idea on how to block spam I'm all ears - until your
idea gets positioned as a Postfix-only solution first.
If you c
On 6/29/2015 9:48 AM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Jun 29, 2015, at 12:35 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 29.06.2015 um 18:29 schrieb Ted Mittelstaedt:
Of course, Postfix fixes everything from AIDS to global warming, it's
the greatest MTA ever invented.
for other MTA'S score-bayes RBL handlin
Am 29.06.2015 um 19:28 schrieb Ted Mittelstaedt:
The days of squeezing every last CPU cycle out of something are
long, gone Reindl.
nonsense
I really appreciate that your bound and determined to keep that
80486 server running but nobody else is doing it anymore.
tell me one reason why sho
The days of squeezing every last CPU cycle out of something are
long, gone Reindl.
I really appreciate that your bound and determined to keep that
80486 server running but nobody else is doing it anymore.
Why do you think SA is written in Perl? Of all languages!!!
Sure, let's pick the -slowest
>On Jun 29, 2015, at 12:35 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> Am 29.06.2015 um 18:29 schrieb Ted Mittelstaedt:
>What other free MTA is there that’s in common use? qmail is dead and
>buried. Sendmail and Exim are pretty much niche. What exactly is wrong
>with Postfix?
Nothing. It's very powerful
On 6/27/2015 4:02 AM, Noel Butler wrote:
Although what you describe is a "workaround", the key is to keep your
house in order so you don't get listed, especially if you have not
actually fixed up the problem,
Oh Noel, why are you giving me fish in a barrel to shoot?
OK, now that you put your
Am 29.06.2015 um 18:42 schrieb ch...@antennex.com:
Hello, this is my first time on the list and would appreciate some help
on a recipe. This may have been answered already as I can't imagine
others not experiencing a similar issue. I've searched google but
haven't found the searchable spamassas
On Jun 29, 2015, at 12:35 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 29.06.2015 um 18:29 schrieb Ted Mittelstaedt:
>> Of course, Postfix fixes everything from AIDS to global warming, it's
>> the greatest MTA ever invented.
>
> for other MTA'S score-bayes RBL handling on MTA level exists too in form of
>
On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, ch...@antennex.com wrote:
How can I format a recipe that will catch the ".in.net" portion of an IP
as many domain names are used in front of that domain bit?
Where do you want to look for that? In the sender's email address? In URLs
embedded in the message body? In MTA re
On Jun 29, 2015, at 10:30 AM, Kris Deugau wrote:
>
> Ben wrote:
>
>> Second, I'm becoming less and less of a buyer on the whole "report it to
>> the ISP" malarky. Its starting to become a bit of a 1990's way of doing
>> it. I increasingly find myself wondering whether ISPs actually bother
>>
and here you go, so the next time before you answer with foam in front
of your mouth and don't get what "something like Postscreen" means
educate yourself!
http://blog.schalanda.name/archives/118-Exim-4-and-policyd-weight.html/
Am 29.06.2015 um 18:35 schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 29.06.2015 um 1
Hello, this is my first time on the list and would appreciate some help on a
recipe. This may have been answered already as I can't imagine others not
experiencing a similar issue. I've searched google but haven't found the
searchable spamassassin list yet.
My question:
How can I format a recip
Am 29.06.2015 um 18:29 schrieb Ted Mittelstaedt:
Of course, Postfix fixes everything from AIDS to global warming, it's
the greatest MTA ever invented.
for other MTA'S score-bayes RBL handling on MTA level exists too in form
of policy daemons
Exactly the kind of thing I would expect from
Ben wrote:
> Second, I'm becoming less and less of a buyer on the whole "report it to
> the ISP" malarky. Its starting to become a bit of a 1990's way of doing
> it. I increasingly find myself wondering whether ISPs actually bother
> to read abuse mails or whether they get filtered straight to
Of course, Postfix fixes everything from AIDS to global warming, it's
the greatest MTA ever invented.
Exactly the kind of thing I would expect from you. Haven't you worn
out that Postfix drum your banging yet?
Ted
On 6/27/2015 3:04 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 27.06.2015 um 10:18 schrieb M
On 2015-06-29 08:37, Ben wrote:
I can't speak about the specifics of this particular change, but
anything that makes it harder to trivially forward a message,
Whilst I obviously can't argue with you in the context of making it easy to
report spam, there are a couple of things to point out.
F
On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, Ben wrote:
Case in point on number two, for some months now I have been receving Spam
originating from a Verizon customer. The Verizon customer appears to be some
sort of marketing company that has a range on the Verizon network.
Every...single...time... I report the spam
I can't speak about the specifics of this particular change, but
anything that makes it harder to trivially forward a message,
Whilst I obviously can't argue with you in the context of making it easy
to report spam, there are a couple of things to point out.
First, Jo said "have removed all
Ben wrote:
> On 27/06/2015 23:00, Jo Rhett wrote:
>> All versions of Yosemite have removed all functionality for sending
>> abuse reports to helpdesks.
>
> Jo,
>
> You're making a few mountains out of molehills here !
>
> They have not "removed all functionality", they have removed ONE function.
On 6/29/2015 9:05 AM, btb wrote:
i was excited to see a link to
https://launchpad.net/~spamassassin/+archive/ubuntu/spamassassin-daily
on https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DownloadFromSvn
but it appears to be defunct. should this be current? or has it been
abandoned? is it missing a cur
i was excited to see a link to
https://launchpad.net/~spamassassin/+archive/ubuntu/spamassassin-daily
on https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DownloadFromSvn
but it appears to be defunct. should this be current? or has it been
abandoned? is it missing a curator?
just curious
thanks
-ben
On Sun, 28 Jun 2015 19:14:40 -0400
Charles Sprickman wrote:
> 0.0000 7 0 non-token data: nspam
> ...
> But I never see any bayes rule hits in the headers of my emails. I
> have in my personal sql prefs the following:
bayes_min_ham_num (Default: 200)
On 27/06/2015 23:00, Jo Rhett wrote:
All versions of Yosemite have removed all functionality for sending
abuse reports to helpdesks.
Jo,
You're making a few mountains out of molehills here !
They have not "removed all functionality", they have removed ONE function.
There is nothing stopping
37 matches
Mail list logo
