On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 07:37:28PM -0400, Charles Sprickman wrote:
> On Jun 22, 2015, at 5:21 PM, Marc Selig
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 05:09:45PM -0400, Charles Sprickman wrote:
> >
> >> Are there any other options for filtering based on language, or any known
> >> patches/fixes fo
Am 25.06.2015 um 02:47 schrieb Joe Acquisto-j4:
Thanks. I don't feel comfortable doing pastebin with this particular email.
Anyway, I found I left out underscore in whitelist_from.
To continue my dumbo routine, how can I re-submit this email to test? The sender has
closed shop for the day
>>> On 6/24/2015 at 6:22 PM, "Kevin A. McGrail" wrote:
> On 6/24/2015 6:18 PM, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
>> Oh, no. Poor wording on my part.
>>
>> The whitelisting is in main.cf. I just expected it would not be subjected
> to being marked as SPAM, due to being whitelisted. That was my
> understa
On Jun 22, 2015, at 5:21 PM, Marc Selig wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 05:09:45PM -0400, Charles Sprickman wrote:
>
>> Are there any other options for filtering based on language, or any known
>> patches/fixes for TextCat to make it a bit less aggressive when it runs
>> across gibberish that i
On 6/24/2015 6:18 PM, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
Oh, no. Poor wording on my part.
The whitelisting is in main.cf. I just expected it would not be subjected to
being marked as SPAM, due to being whitelisted. That was my understanding.
The user in whitelist rule should equate to a -100 scoring rul
>>> On 6/24/2015 at 5:23 PM, John Hardin wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jun 2015, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
>
>> I am off site so cannot provide more details, but, basically, a smooth
>> running SA with a white listed email address, that has worked fine, ie,
>> being let thru without muss or fuss, decided to
On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 17:14:37 -0400
Bill Cole wrote:
> You snipped out what I was specifically responding to:
>
> On 22 Jun 2015, at 21:45 , Michael B Allen wrote:
>
> > bayes_file_mode 0777
Ok, I misunderstood. I thought you were referring to things being run as
root.
On Wed, 24 Jun 2015, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
I am off site so cannot provide more details, but, basically, a smooth
running SA with a white listed email address, that has worked fine, ie,
being let thru without muss or fuss, decided to scan one email from that
address, anyway. And of course it
On 24 Jun 2015, at 16:21, RW wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 22:42:09 -0400
Bill Cole wrote:
On 22 Jun 2015, at 21:45, Michael B Allen wrote:
So with a default install (CentOS 7 in my case and I suspect pretty
much all other systems), bayes will NOT just work by default unless
you explicitly mod
On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 22:42:09 -0400
Bill Cole wrote:
> On 22 Jun 2015, at 21:45, Michael B Allen wrote:
> > So with a default install (CentOS 7 in my case and I suspect pretty
> > much all other systems), bayes will NOT just work by default unless
> > you explicitly modify /etc/mail/spamassassin/l
I am off site so cannot provide more details, but, basically, a smooth running
SA with a white listed email address, that has worked fine, ie, being let thru
without muss or fuss, decided to scan one email from that address, anyway.
And of course it got marked up and marked as possible SPAM.
I
On 23 Jun 2015, at 14:58, Michael B Allen wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Bill Cole
wrote:
Yes, I want a system-wide bayes db. And I am running spamd and spamc
and I assume that is all working (but of course I have no idea if it
really is).
But I want users to be able to put spams th
12 matches
Mail list logo
