On 21/06/2015 06:46, Bill Cole wrote:
> Nope. None of the recent crop of new gTLDs has been the source of measurable
> legitimate mail. The .science sewer is the latest in a steady stream of gTLDs
> to be poisoned by spammers taking advantage of an inherently irresponsible
> registry busine
On 21/06/2015 02:16, Richard Doyle wrote:
> On 06/20/2015 08:38 AM, Jered Floyd wrote:
>
>> Hello SA-users,
>>
>> I have a question on the other side of things: outgoing mail. I know
>> this is off-topic but this seems to the only venue where there might
>> be knowledge of the problem, and
On 21/06/2015 01:49, Jered Floyd wrote:
> Harald,
>
>> no you don't understand how a Barracuda appliance works
>> emailreg.org is a whitelist like the ones spamassassin is using
>>
>> in case of a barracuda appliance it overrides the RBL
>
> It's a whitelist that appears to be based solely
On 21/06/2015 01:38, Jered Floyd wrote:
> I appear to be getting a shakedown scam from Barracuda Networks. They seem to
> be getting out of the "anti-spam" and into the "protection racket" business.
>
> A small number of recipients have been getting bounce-unsubscribed a
> community mailing
On 19 Jun 2015, at 13:46, Axb wrote:
On 19.06.2015 19:42, Philip Prindeville wrote:
No offense to lepers, but is .science to be avoided? I’ve had
email this week from about 17 different .science domain names, and 13
were blocked because of ZenBL and the rest turned out to be SPAM
anyway.
I
On Sat, 20 Jun 2015, Axb wrote:
On 19.06.2015 22:41, Marc Perkel wrote:
I found a great trick for wasting spammer's resources and getting them
blacklisted that I'd like to share will all of you.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tarpit_%28networking%29
Wasn't this last decade's FUSSP ?
Also s
On 06/20/2015 08:38 AM, Jered Floyd wrote:
>
> Hello SA-users,
>
> I have a question on the other side of things: outgoing mail. I know
> this is off-topic but this seems to the only venue where there might
> be knowledge of the problem, and the offender is a spamassassin
> "customer".
>
> (I oper
Am 20.06.2015 um 17:49 schrieb Jered Floyd:
Harald,
no you don't understand how a Barracuda appliance works
emailreg.org is a whitelist like the ones spamassassin is using
in case of a barracuda appliance it overrides the RBL
It's a whitelist that appears to be based solely on paying Barra
Harald,
> no you don't understand how a Barracuda appliance works
> emailreg.org is a whitelist like the ones spamassassin is using
>
> in case of a barracuda appliance it overrides the RBL
It's a whitelist that appears to be based solely on paying Barracuda a fee.
That doesn't sound like a v
Am 20.06.2015 um 17:38 schrieb Jered Floyd:
A small number of recipients have been getting bounce-unsubscribed a
community mailing list that I administer. The most recent bounces say
that this "blocked using Barracuda Reputation;
http://www.barracudanetworks.com/reputation/"; Visiting that pa
On 20.06.15 09:39, Simone Vassili wrote:
one of my customer had a trouble with spamassassin on my server.
He sent me a mail but this mail was recognized by sa as spam!
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=5.417 tagged_above=4 required=4.5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX_IMAGE=0.001,
Hello SA-users,
I have a question on the other side of things: outgoing mail. I know this is
off-topic but this seems to the only venue where there might be knowledge of
the problem, and the offender is a spamassassin "customer".
(I operate an MTA host on which I run SpamAssassin -- it works
Hello,
Attached you find the output of the sa-learn execution. The nine
spam E-Mails learned are there because I manually learned a mbox
file with spam. As you can see the ham part seems to work.
is there anyone who could help me on this or anyone who has the same
problem?
Or is it better to
On Sat, 20 Jun 2015 14:41:36 +0200
Dieter Scholz wrote:
> > Attached you find the output of the sa-learn execution. The nine
> > spam E-Mails learned are there because I manually learned a mbox
> > file with spam. As you can see the ham part seems to work.
> >
> is there anyone who could help me
Hello,
My problem is: The bayes filter does (auto-)learn ham mails but no
spam mails. In my logs I found spam mails that have a very high score
and should be autolearned. I think my bayes setup is correct, because
ham mails are learned as expected.
Autolearning is based on a different scor
On Sat Jun 20 13:11:18 2015, RW wrote:
> The error is about a missing virtual user. Is "spamass-milter" perhaps a
> default virtual user used when an email has multiple recipients?
This email was sent to an unique recipient and ala...@gozmail.net is a
valid virtual user ton the server.
--
alari
On Sat, 20 Jun 2015 12:11:56 +0200
alarig wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I installed a spamassassin instance on my email server, it works but I
> have a strange error on each email: ?spamd[12325]: spamd: handle_user
> unable to find user: 'spamass-milter'?
> My MTA is postfix and I use spamass-milter. This is
On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 21:06:17 +
David Jones wrote:
> >From: Marc Perkel
> >Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 3:41 PM
> >To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> >Subject: Help me waste spammers resources
>
> >I found a great trick for wasting spammer's resources and getting
> >them blacklisted that I'd
Am 20.06.2015 um 09:39 schrieb Simone Vassili:
Hi,
one of my customer had a trouble with spamassassin on my server.
He sent me a mail but this mail was recognized by sa as spam!
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=5.417 tagged_above=4 required=4.5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX_IMAGE=0.001,
Hi,
I installed a spamassassin instance on my email server, it works but I
have a strange error on each email: “spamd[12325]: spamd: handle_user
unable to find user: 'spamass-milter'”
My MTA is postfix and I use spamass-milter. This is odd because I tell
spamd and spamass-milter to run as vmail us
On 19.06.2015 22:41, Marc Perkel wrote:
I found a great trick for wasting spammer's resources and getting them
blacklisted that I'd like to share will all of you.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tarpit_%28networking%29
Wasn't this last decade's FUSSP ?
Also see
http://labrea.sourceforge.net/lab
On Saturday 20 June 2015 at 09:39:19 (EU time), Simone Vassili wrote:
> Hi,
> one of my customer had a trouble with spamassassin on my server.
> He sent me a mail but this mail was recognized by sa as spam!
>
> X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=5.417 tagged_above=4 required=4.5
> tests=[BAYES_00=-1
Hi,
one of my customer had a trouble with spamassassin on my server.
He sent me a mail but this mail was recognized by sa as spam!
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=5.417 tagged_above=4 required=4.5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX_IMAGE=0.001,
DYN_RDNS_AND_INLINE_IMAGE=1.168, DYN_
23 matches
Mail list logo
