Hello,
Hello,
My problem is: The bayes filter does (auto-)learn ham mails but no
spam mails. In my logs I found spam mails that have a very high score
and should be autolearned. I think my bayes setup is correct, because
ham mails are learned as expected.
Autolearning is based on a different
On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 23:08:55 +0200
Franz Schwartau wrote:
> Hi!
>
> A few days ago I replaced AWL with TxRep. From time to time I get
> unusual high scores caused by TxRep since then.
>
> So I started debugging the TxRep plugin a bit. The high scores are
> caused by "HELO: localhost" after sa-le
On 17-06-15 20:00, Dieter Scholz wrote:
> Hello,
>
>>> My problem is: The bayes filter does (auto-)learn ham mails but no
>>> spam mails. In my logs I found spam mails that have a very high score
>>> and should be autolearned. I think my bayes setup is correct, because
>>> ham mails are learned
Hi!
A few days ago I replaced AWL with TxRep. From time to time I get
unusual high scores caused by TxRep since then.
So I started debugging the TxRep plugin a bit. The high scores are
caused by "HELO: localhost" after sa-learn of a spam mailbox.
In check_senders_reputation() line 1252 reads:
f
Hello,
My problem is: The bayes filter does (auto-)learn ham mails but no
spam mails. In my logs I found spam mails that have a very high score
and should be autolearned. I think my bayes setup is correct, because
ham mails are learned as expected.
Autolearning is based on a different score to
Hello
you need to find out how these values are set
* bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam -0.001
* bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam 9.0
I have set these lines today. Do these differ from the default values?
Dieter
On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 17:19:43 +0200
Dieter Scholz wrote:
> My problem is: The bayes filter does (auto-)learn ham mails but no
> spam mails. In my logs I found spam mails that have a very high score
> and should be autolearned. I think my bayes setup is correct, because
> ham mails are learned as ex
Am 17.06.2015 um 17:44 schrieb Dieter Scholz:
I have a new mail setup using Debian Jessie with postfix, amavisd-new,
amavisd-milter and spamassassin. I use the versions from the Jessie
repository. My setup does pre-queue filtering, so Spamassassin does
the checks while the mail is not finally qu
Hello,
I have a new mail setup using Debian Jessie with postfix, amavisd-new,
amavisd-milter and spamassassin. I use the versions from the Jessie
repository. My setup does pre-queue filtering, so Spamassassin does
the checks while the mail is not finally queued. Postfix calls Amavis
through t
Hello,
I have a new mail setup using Debian Jessie with postfix, amavisd-new,
amavisd-milter and spamassassin. I use the versions from the Jessie
repository. My setup does pre-queue filtering, so Spamassassin does the
checks while the mail is not finally queued. Postfix calls Amavis
through t
On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 21:12:42 +0200
Bruno Costacurta wrote:
>
> Quoting RW :
> > Your actual problem is that the rule isn't showing in the spamd
> > debug. If postfix.org isn't in the "From" header then SA needs to
> > find it in an appropriate envelope header. See the documentation for
> > white
11 matches
Mail list logo