Philip Prindeville skrev den 2015-05-21 02:20:
Anyone know of a site that you can send an email to in order to test
your SPF and/or DKIM configuration?
https://dmarcian.com/
I’ve set it up but every once in a while I get back weird messages
about being blocked from certain sites and I’m wonde
On 5/20/2015 8:20 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
Anyone know of a site that you can send an email to in order to test your SPF
and/or DKIM configuration?
I’ve set it up but every once in a while I get back weird messages about being
blocked from certain sites and I’m wondering if something is w
On Apr 15, 2015, at 7:07 PM, @lbutlr wrote:
> On Apr 13, 2015, at 09:03, John Hardin wrote:
>> The proper place for that sort of thing would be the tool that does final
>> delivery to the user's mailbox.
>
> There is no proper place for that.
>
No, it’s not. But Mimedefang is.
-Philip
Anyone know of a site that you can send an email to in order to test your SPF
and/or DKIM configuration?
I’ve set it up but every once in a while I get back weird messages about being
blocked from certain sites and I’m wondering if something is wrong at my end or
are they just misconfigured at
On 20.05.2015 18:29, Steve Rainwater wrote:
I've set up spamassassin with a site-wide bayes configuration. I have
some spamtrap email addresses that supply fresh spam into bayes for
training on a cron job. However, from what I've read, bayes needs to
have ongoing ham as well as spam for training
On 5/20/2015 12:29 PM, Steve Rainwater wrote:
I've set up spamassassin with a site-wide bayes configuration. I have
some spamtrap email addresses that supply fresh spam into bayes for
training on a cron job. However, from what I've read, bayes needs to
have ongoing ham as well as spam for trainin
I've set up spamassassin with a site-wide bayes configuration. I have
some spamtrap email addresses that supply fresh spam into bayes for
training on a cron job. However, from what I've read, bayes needs to
have ongoing ham as well as spam for training in order to work well.
What's the usual method
On 19.05.2015 20:38, Alex Regan wrote:
Hi,
On 05/19/2015 11:40 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 19.05.2015 um 17:11 schrieb Alex Regan:
I'm wondering if anyone is interested in helping to develop a set of
rules to catch SEO spam? Here's one such example:
http://pastebin.com/S6Jeappj
It's those e
