On 4/13/2015 6:24 PM, Roman Gelfand wrote:
I have deployed spamassassin with postfix on mail gateway machine.
My dovecot mailbox server is on another machine. The mail on mailbox
server is stored on maildir.
If I understand this correctly, If I want to run sa-learn, I need to
nfs mount mai
On Mon, 13 Apr 2015, Roman Gelfand wrote:
I have deployed spamassassin with postfix on mail gateway machine. My
dovecot mailbox server is on another machine. The mail on mailbox server
is stored on maildir.
If I understand this correctly, If I want to run sa-learn, I need to nfs
mount mailbo
I have deployed spamassassin with postfix on mail gateway machine. My
dovecot mailbox server is on another machine. The mail on mailbox server
is stored on maildir.
If I understand this correctly, If I want to run sa-learn, I need to nfs
mount mailbox server to the mail gateway.
Is this an opt
On Mon, 13 Apr 2015, sha...@shanew.net wrote:
On Mon, 13 Apr 2015, John Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 13 Apr 2015, Shane Williams wrote:
> Somewhat related questions:
>
> 1. If I alter a rule's score to 0 locally, my understanding is that
> the rule won't even be tested for. Does that also
On Mon, 13 Apr 2015, John Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 13 Apr 2015, Shane Williams wrote:
Somewhat related questions:
1. If I alter a rule's score to 0 locally, my understanding is that
the rule won't even be tested for. Does that also mean it won't count
toward meta-rules?
That depends on ho
On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 09:10:56 -0500 (CDT)
Shane Williams wrote:
> Somewhat related questions:
>
> 1. If I alter a rule's score to 0 locally, my understanding is that
> the rule won't even be tested for. Does that also mean it won't count
> toward meta-rules?
AFAIK
> 2. Is there a way to create
On Mon, 13 Apr 2015, Shane Williams wrote:
Somewhat related questions:
1. If I alter a rule's score to 0 locally, my understanding is that
the rule won't even be tested for. Does that also mean it won't count
toward meta-rules?
That depends on how it's used in the meta rule. If it's used as
On Mon, 13 Apr 2015, Winfried wrote:
I was wondering if SpamAssasin could be configured to convert UTF-8
e-mails into ISO-8859-1 prior to sanitization?
No. That isn't SA's job. It is a scanning tool. Please don't try to turn
it into a swiss army knife.
See if there are some options in your
Somewhat related questions:
1. If I alter a rule's score to 0 locally, my understanding is that
the rule won't even be tested for. Does that also mean it won't count
toward meta-rules?
2. Is there a way to create a local rule that uses the DKIM/SPF
information such that I could match to other h
Winfried skrev den 2015-04-13 12:22:
I'm using an old e-mail client that doesn't support UTF-8, which means
that
any incoming e-mails that used UTF-8 has all its accented characters
turned
into garbage.
+1
I was wondering if SpamAssasin could be configured to convert UTF-8
e-mails
into IS
Am 13.04.2015 um 12:22 schrieb Winfried:
Hello
I'm using an old e-mail client that doesn't support UTF-8, which means that
any incoming e-mails that used UTF-8 has all its accented characters turned
into garbage.
honestly change the mail client, we have 2015 now
I was wondering if SpamAssa
Hello
I'm using an old e-mail client that doesn't support UTF-8, which means that
any incoming e-mails that used UTF-8 has all its accented characters turned
into garbage.
I was wondering if SpamAssasin could be configured to convert UTF-8 e-mails
into ISO-8859-1 prior to sanitization?
If not, d
12 matches
Mail list logo
