On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 20:46:10 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 19.03.2015 um 20:35 schrieb RW:
> > On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 01:12:15 +0100
> > Reindl Harald wrote:
> >>
> >> the last point is easy to prove by having the old, unmodified
> >> corpus and run spamc against the cleaned bayes database a
Am 19.03.2015 um 20:35 schrieb RW:
On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 01:12:15 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 19.03.2015 um 00:54 schrieb RW:
This is nothing to do with auto-learning. There is a difference
between miss-training and training with spam that contains
so-called "Bayes poison". Bayes is best
On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 01:12:15 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 19.03.2015 um 00:54 schrieb RW:
> > This is nothing to do with auto-learning. There is a difference
> > between miss-training and training with spam that contains
> > so-called "Bayes poison". Bayes is best trained on what is in
> > r
Am 19.03.2015 um 19:48 schrieb Bill Cole:
On 18 Mar 2015, at 17:24, Axb wrote:
Why is "Internal" or local mail sent thru SA?
If the MTA handles outbound mail from Windows users, passing their mail
through SA is prudent. There are spamming trojans that figure out how to
use the victim's legit
On 18 Mar 2015, at 17:24, Axb wrote:
Why is "Internal" or local mail sent thru SA?
If the MTA handles outbound mail from Windows users, passing their mail
through SA is prudent. There are spamming trojans that figure out how to
use the victim's legitimate submission config including credenti
Am 19.03.2015 um 13:53 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
Am 18.03.2015 um 22:29 schrieb David B Funk:
Just have an internal mail-submission port that isn't routed thru SA
On 18.03.15 22:46, Reindl Harald wrote:
may not be possible if you have hundrets of domains without setup a
internal DNS v
Am 18.03.2015 um 22:29 schrieb David B Funk:
Just have an internal mail-submission port that isn't routed thru SA
On 18.03.15 22:46, Reindl Harald wrote:
may not be possible if you have hundrets of domains without setup a
internal DNS view just for a different MX
Am 19.03.2015 um 09:22 sch
Last warning. Offlist with these emails or next step is list removal.
Regards,
KAM
On 3/19/15, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> and in fact i was *never ever* that abusive as you are all the time
> beause there is a difference in get heatet in a technical discussion or
> like you do absue for the sake of abuse
>
hahahaha thankfulyl google shows otherwise
> so you better stop making yo
well, i never pretended to be the nicest person on the world but the
difference between both of us is that i *never ever* go out and seek
postings from a specific person and call him/her names without any
context to the thread and technical background just because it's he/her
and in fact i was
I am getting tired of all of the personal attacks. End it, everyone. Stick to
facts or take it offlist. I don't care which.
Regards,
KAM
hahahaha come on reindl, do you think people here will bother to click
your links when all they only need do is google "reindl harald" to
get an unbiased view of who you really are and the sort of offensive
abusive creep you really are.
fedora users BANNED
roundcube MODERATED
postifx BANNED
Cen
Am 19.03.2015 um 13:09 schrieb Nick Edwards:
On 3/19/15, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 19.03.2015 um 12:57 schrieb Nick Edwards:
On 3/19/15, Steve Freegard wrote:
On 18/03/15 21:46, Reindl Harald wrote:
Wow - you must be fun at parties...
HAHAHA reindl doesnt go to parties because , he has no
On 3/19/15, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 19.03.2015 um 12:57 schrieb Nick Edwards:
>> On 3/19/15, Steve Freegard wrote:
>>> On 18/03/15 21:46, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>>
>>> Wow - you must be fun at parties...
>>>
>>
>> HAHAHA reindl doesnt go to parties because , he has no friends and no
>> one wou
Am 19.03.2015 um 12:57 schrieb Nick Edwards:
On 3/19/15, Steve Freegard wrote:
On 18/03/15 21:46, Reindl Harald wrote:
Wow - you must be fun at parties...
HAHAHA reindl doesnt go to parties because , he has no friends and no
one would have him, he can start a fight when he's the only tosse
Am 19.03.2015 um 12:30 schrieb Steve Freegard:
On 18/03/15 21:46, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 18.03.2015 um 22:29 schrieb David B Funk:
> Just have an internal mail-submission port that isn't routed thru SA
may not be possible if you have hundrets of domains without setup a
internal DNS view jus
On 3/19/15, Steve Freegard wrote:
> On 18/03/15 21:46, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>
> Wow - you must be fun at parties...
>
>
HAHAHA reindl doesnt go to parties because , he has no friends and no
one would have him, he can start a fight when he's the only tosser in
the room.
On 18/03/15 21:46, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 18.03.2015 um 22:29 schrieb David B Funk:
> Just have an internal mail-submission port that isn't routed thru SA
may not be possible if you have hundrets of domains without setup a
internal DNS view just for a different MX
In general you don't want
Am 19.03.2015 um 09:22 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
Am 18.03.2015 um 22:29 schrieb David B Funk:
Just have an internal mail-submission port that isn't routed thru SA
On 18.03.15 22:46, Reindl Harald wrote:
may not be possible if you have hundrets of domains without setup a
internal DNS vi
Am 18.03.2015 um 22:29 schrieb David B Funk:
Just have an internal mail-submission port that isn't routed thru SA
On 18.03.15 22:46, Reindl Harald wrote:
may not be possible if you have hundrets of domains without setup a
internal DNS view just for a different MX
You apparently mean internal
20 matches
Mail list logo
