On 3/15/15, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Am 14.03.2015 um 20:22 schrieb David F. Skoll:
>> On Sat, 14 Mar 2015 20:17:27 +0100
>> Robert Schetterer wrote:
>>
>>> Ok, but big spam mails are extrem rare, i wouldnt invest time in that
>>
>> They are quite rare, but common enough IMO that our customers
I have been getting large spam messages for several years on one of my
accounts. Since spamassassin cannot handle them, my only recourse are
procmail recipes.
-- Twitter: JudeDaShiell
On Sun, 15 Mar 2015, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 15.03.2015 um 12:05 schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 14.03.20
On 2015-03-15 17:26, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 16.03.2015 um 01:23 schrieb Dave Warren:
On 2015-03-15 15:01, Reindl Harald wrote:
surely, only 5% of incoming spam attempts make it to spamassassin /
clamav here, but you need to keep in mind the amount of your regular
ham messages in your mailflow
Am 16.03.2015 um 01:23 schrieb Dave Warren:
On 2015-03-15 15:01, Reindl Harald wrote:
surely, only 5% of incoming spam attempts make it to spamassassin /
clamav here, but you need to keep in mind the amount of your regular
ham messages in your mailflow which unconditionally touch the content
sc
On 2015-03-15 15:01, Reindl Harald wrote:
surely, only 5% of incoming spam attempts make it to spamassassin /
clamav here, but you need to keep in mind the amount of your regular
ham messages in your mailflow which unconditionally touch the content
scanners
Why would it? I'd hazard a guess t
Am 15.03.2015 um 22:19 schrieb Robert Schetterer:
hypothetical...
spam tagging by spamassassin is "expensive" by design so it should be
the last step in a long chain of different "antispam" features mostly
i.e postscreen, clamav-milter, greylisting, rbl filtering, spf dkim
dmarc checks
surel
Am 15.03.2015 um 19:03 schrieb Axb:
> On 03/15/2015 06:49 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> Am 15.03.2015 um 18:32 schrieb Robert Schetterer:
>>> tagging is allowed, rejecting is nice but not a must have
>>
>> if you like reject try working in milter chaining with
>> milter-manager http://milter-mana
On Sun, 15 Mar 2015 14:19:17 -0500 (CDT)
Dave Funk wrote:
> However that glue can be intelligent and contain business logic.
And getting back to the original topic... that is why my favorite
milter is MIMEDefang. :)
It does integrate with SpamAssassin, but it also lets you write your own
busine
On 03/15/2015 09:27 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.03.2015 um 21:12 schrieb Axb:
On 03/15/2015 09:00 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
that could be even a sloppy implementation just truncate after XX
bytes
and analyze the remaining piece to keep that part simple and fast - at
the end it would improve
Am 15.03.2015 um 21:12 schrieb Axb:
On 03/15/2015 09:00 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
that could be even a sloppy implementation just truncate after XX bytes
and analyze the remaining piece to keep that part simple and fast - at
the end it would improve the result with as less as possible overhead
a
On 03/15/2015 09:00 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.03.2015 um 20:35 schrieb Axb:
On 03/15/2015 08:22 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.03.2015 um 19:50 schrieb Martin Gregorie:
On Sun, 2015-03-15 at 19:23 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.03.2015 um 19:15 schrieb Axb:
true but if the glue (
Am 15.03.2015 um 20:35 schrieb Axb:
On 03/15/2015 08:22 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.03.2015 um 19:50 schrieb Martin Gregorie:
On Sun, 2015-03-15 at 19:23 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.03.2015 um 19:15 schrieb Axb:
true but if the glue (spamass-milter) would truncate the message it
On 03/15/2015 08:22 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.03.2015 um 19:50 schrieb Martin Gregorie:
On Sun, 2015-03-15 at 19:23 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.03.2015 um 19:15 schrieb Axb:
true but if the glue (spamass-milter) would truncate the message it
passes to spamc it would get back that
Am 15.03.2015 um 19:50 schrieb Martin Gregorie:
On Sun, 2015-03-15 at 19:23 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.03.2015 um 19:15 schrieb Axb:
true but if the glue (spamass-milter) would truncate the message it
passes to spamc it would get back that truncated message with the added
headers (whic
Am 15.03.2015 um 19:03 schrieb Axb:
IMO, deciding what chunk of a msg should be scanned should be managed by
the glue and not by SA.
On 15.03.15 19:09, Reindl Harald wrote:
true but if the glue (spamass-milter) would truncate the message it
passes to spamc it would get back that truncated mess
On Sun, 15 Mar 2015, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.03.2015 um 19:15 schrieb Axb:
On 03/15/2015 07:09 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
[snip..]
IMO, deciding what chunk of a msg should be scanned should be managed by
the glue and not by SA.
true but if the glue (spamass-milter) would truncate the m
On Sun, 2015-03-15 at 19:23 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 15.03.2015 um 19:15 schrieb Axb:
> > On 03/15/2015 07:09 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >>
> >> Am 15.03.2015 um 19:03 schrieb Axb:
> >>> On 03/15/2015 06:49 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Am 15.03.2015 um 18:32 schrieb Robert Schette
Am 15.03.2015 um 19:15 schrieb Axb:
On 03/15/2015 07:09 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.03.2015 um 19:03 schrieb Axb:
On 03/15/2015 06:49 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 15.03.2015 um 18:32 schrieb Robert Schetterer:
tagging is allowed, rejecting is nice but not a must have
if you like re
On 03/15/2015 07:09 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.03.2015 um 19:03 schrieb Axb:
On 03/15/2015 06:49 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 15.03.2015 um 18:32 schrieb Robert Schetterer:
tagging is allowed, rejecting is nice but not a must have
if you like reject try working in milter chaining wit
Am 15.03.2015 um 19:03 schrieb Axb:
On 03/15/2015 06:49 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 15.03.2015 um 18:32 schrieb Robert Schetterer:
tagging is allowed, rejecting is nice but not a must have
if you like reject try working in milter chaining with
milter-manager http://milter-manager.sourcef
On 03/15/2015 06:49 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 15.03.2015 um 18:32 schrieb Robert Schetterer:
tagging is allowed, rejecting is nice but not a must have
if you like reject try working in milter chaining with
milter-manager http://milter-manager.sourceforge.net/ ( stats included )
this give
Am 15.03.2015 um 18:32 schrieb Robert Schetterer:
> tagging is allowed, rejecting is nice but not a must have
if you like reject try working in milter chaining with
milter-manager http://milter-manager.sourceforge.net/ ( stats included )
this gives you option for complex filter scenarios with div
Am 15.03.2015 um 17:53 schrieb Reindl Harald:
>
> Am 15.03.2015 um 17:24 schrieb Robert Schetterer:
>> Am 15.03.2015 um 12:05 schrieb Reindl Harald:
>>>
>>> Am 14.03.2015 um 20:17 schrieb Robert Schetterer:
Am 14.03.2015 um 18:11 schrieb Reindl Harald:
> nobody but talks about cut content
Am 15.03.2015 um 17:24 schrieb Robert Schetterer:
Am 15.03.2015 um 12:05 schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 14.03.2015 um 20:17 schrieb Robert Schetterer:
Am 14.03.2015 um 18:11 schrieb Reindl Harald:
nobody but talks about cut content
we talk about how to pass only a part to spamassassin instead sk
Am 15.03.2015 um 12:05 schrieb Reindl Harald:
>
> Am 14.03.2015 um 20:17 schrieb Robert Schetterer:
>> Am 14.03.2015 um 18:11 schrieb Reindl Harald:
>>> nobody but talks about cut content
>>>
>>> we talk about how to pass only a part to spamassassin instead skip large
>>> messages entirely which i
Am 14.03.2015 um 20:17 schrieb Robert Schetterer:
Am 14.03.2015 um 18:11 schrieb Reindl Harald:
nobody but talks about cut content
we talk about how to pass only a part to spamassassin instead skip large
messages entirely which in many case would be enough to detect a message
as spam because t
26 matches
Mail list logo
