Re: Improve spam hit rate

> On Mar 10, 2015, at 12:54 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 10.03.2015 um 18:29 schrieb Lorenzo Thurman: >> I have these messages in a paste: http://pastebin.com/jNQfRerx. They >> were received about 1 1/2 hours apart. After I received the first one, I >> ran sudo sa-learn —spam /path/to/mail

Re: Chain content filters in Postfix

On 03/10/2015 11:39 PM, Roger Walters wrote: Hello, I have my Postfix configured so smtp is filtered by SpamAssassin: smtp inet n - - - - smtpd -o content_filter=spamassassin spamassassin unix - n n - - pipe user=d

Re: Chain content filters in Postfix

Am 10.03.2015 um 23:39 schrieb Roger Walters: Hello, I have my Postfix configured so smtp is filtered by SpamAssassin: smtp inet n - - - - smtpd -o content_filter=spamassassin spamassassin unix - n n - - pipe user

Chain content filters in Postfix

Hello, I have my Postfix configured so smtp is filtered by SpamAssassin: smtp inet n - - - - smtpd -o content_filter=spamassassin spamassassin unix - n n - - pipe user=debian-spamd argv=/usr/bin/spamc -f -e /usr/bin/py

Re: spamc --full don't work

thanks - writing the bugreport was still on my to-do list, still at cleanup samples of my spam-corpus from bayes-poisioning which was the intention to use spamc over the whole corpus there is *a lot* of poisioning containing random words, poems, fortunes and what not in a lot of mails, sometim

Re: Bogus day old domains from RRPPROXY.NET

Am 10.03.2015 um 23:01 schrieb Kevin Miller: -Original Message- From: Kevin A. McGrail [mailto:kmcgr...@pccc.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 1:31 PM To: Kevin Miller; users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Bogus day old domains from RRPPROXY.NET On 2/19/2015 2:50 PM, Kevin Mille

RE: Bogus day old domains from RRPPROXY.NET

> -Original Message- > From: Kevin A. McGrail [mailto:kmcgr...@pccc.com] > Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 1:31 PM > To: Kevin Miller; users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: Bogus day old domains from RRPPROXY.NET > > On 2/19/2015 2:50 PM, Kevin Miller wrote: > > Is there a way to reje

Re: spamc --full don't work

FYI, I've opened bug 7155 https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7155 for this issue On 3/5/2015 2:08 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: On 3/5/2015 1:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: according to spamc --help "-R" and "--full" is the same in fact in case of a ham-message only -R works as expe

Re: Bogus day old domains from RRPPROXY.NET

On 2/19/2015 2:50 PM, Kevin Miller wrote: Is there a way to reject or up the score on anything that is served up by that name server or registar? I was thinking maybe putting the rrproxy.net nameserver in my dns as 127.0.0.1, on the theory that if it doesn't resolve the message will be reject

Re: Improve spam hit rate

On Tue, 10 Mar 2015, Lorenzo Thurman wrote: I have these messages in a paste: http://pastebin.com/jNQfRerx . They were received about 1 1/2 hours apart. After I received the first one, I ran sudo sa-learn —spam /path/to/mail/folder against it and then sudo sa-lear

Improve spam hit rate

I have these messages in a paste: http://pastebin.com/jNQfRerx . They were received about 1 1/2 hours apart. After I received the first one, I ran sudo sa-learn —spam /path/to/mail/folder against it and then sudo sa-learn —sync. spamassasin reported that it ‘learne

Re: crm114 usage

On 09.03.2015 22:04, Axb wrote: > There was a SA plugin for SA 3.x > (http://mschuette.name/wp/crm114-spamassassin-plugin/) > no idea if thats stufff is still mantained.. Thanks for mentioning my Plugin. I still provide minimal maintenance, i.e. I run it on my private mailserver to verify compatib

Re: crm114 usage

On 03/09/2015 10:57 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: --On Monday, March 09, 2015 11:04 PM +0100 Axb wrote: On 03/09/2015 08:00 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: Is anyone using crm114 still these days for scoring with in SpamAssassin? If so, does it seem to be an additional effective tool in help