On 16. feb. 2015 00.59.42 Alex Regan wrote:
Hi,
>> Could this somehow be related to the SVN spamassassin?
>> Ideas greatly appreciated.
>
> check *.pre files or install mail-dkim in feodore, possible make a bug
> in feodore if not working, was mail-dkim not suggest rpm package when
> instaling
Hi,
Could this somehow be related to the SVN spamassassin?
Ideas greatly appreciated.
check *.pre files or install mail-dkim in feodore, possible make a bug
in feodore if not working, was mail-dkim not suggest rpm package when
instaling ?
possible test "spamassassin 2>&1 -D --lint | less" see
On 15. feb. 2015 23.24.14 Alex Regan wrote:
Could this somehow be related to the SVN spamassassin?
Ideas greatly appreciated.
check *.pre files or install mail-dkim in feodore, possible make a bug in
feodore if not working, was mail-dkim not suggest rpm package when instaling ?
possible te
Hi,
I'm using a version of spamassassin from svn about a week ago on
fedora20, and just noticed a problem with my DKIM configuration:
Feb 15 17:04:07.045 [989] dbg: dkim: cannot load Mail::DKIM module, DKIM
checks disabled: Insecure dependency
in require while running with -T switch at
/usr/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 15-02-15 01:24, LuKreme wrote:
> On 12 Feb 2015, at 17:58 , Dave Pooser
> wrote:
>> Also, I score blacklist_from at 80 points so an address that's
>> both blacklisted and whitelisted will be effectively whitelisted,
>> thanks to a net -20 score.
Am 15.02.2015 um 19:35 schrieb LuKreme:
> On 15 Feb 2015, at 04:01 , Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> Am 15.02.2015 um 01:29 schrieb LuKreme:
>>> Spamass-milter is (as designed, I’m sure) checking outbound mail. When it
>>> does this, SPF checks fail and a lot of outbound mail is getting scored as
>>
On 15 Feb 2015, at 12:05 , Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 15.02.2015 um 20:00 schrieb LuKreme:
>>
>> -o receive_override_options=no_milter
>
> sorry - copy&paste error
> no_milterS
Funny we were both making the same typo at the same time… Sigh.
Thanks, sorted now. Yay.
> http://www.postfix.org/p
Am 15.02.2015 um 20:00 schrieb LuKreme:
On 15 Feb 2015, at 11:44 , Reindl Harald wrote:
by set "-o receive_override_options=no_milter" for your submission service in
“master.cf"
I tried that already.
mail submit-tls/smtpd[46597]: fatal: unknown receive_override_options value "no_milter"
i
On 15 Feb 2015, at 11:44 , Reindl Harald wrote:
> by set "-o receive_override_options=no_milter" for your submission service in
> “master.cf"
I tried that already.
mail submit-tls/smtpd[46597]: fatal: unknown receive_override_options value
"no_milter" in "no_milter"
submission inet n
Am 15.02.2015 um 19:35 schrieb LuKreme:
On 15 Feb 2015, at 04:01 , Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 15.02.2015 um 01:29 schrieb LuKreme:
Spamass-milter is (as designed, I’m sure) checking outbound mail. When it does
this, SPF checks fail and a lot of outbound mail is getting scored as spam
beca
On 15 Feb 2015, at 04:29 , Reindl Harald wrote:
> attached a "local.cf" from the submission server
I just have the one server handling submission and outbound mail.
# postconf -n | grep milter
milter_default_action = accept
smtpd_milters = unix:/var/run/spamass-milter.sock
# grep milter /etc
On 15 Feb 2015, at 04:01 , Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Am 15.02.2015 um 01:29 schrieb LuKreme:
>> Spamass-milter is (as designed, I’m sure) checking outbound mail. When it
>> does this, SPF checks fail and a lot of outbound mail is getting scored as
>> spam because of it.
>
> works like designed
On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 20:51:07 -0500
David Mehler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've got an email setup which includes Postfix as MTA, Amavisd-new as
> content filter, Spamassassin for antispam work, Dovecot for Imap
> services, all of which with the exception of Amavisd use a Mysql
> database. Mail delivery
On 15. feb. 2015 11.52.10 LuKreme wrote:
score blacklist_from 5.0
score whitelist_auth -10.0
nope, the above does not even lint
try for debug only
whitelist_auth *@*.*
blacklist_from *@*.*
then test a copple of mails what hits when
its complitated since its your mails, and every one have
On 2/14/15 5:13 PM, "LuKreme" wrote:
>Also, I do not delete received mail, regardless of how spammy it is
>(well, I do if it¹s *my* mail and the spam score is over 10). It all gets
>delivered to the user where they are able to scan the Junk folder and
>recover any messages that were mistagged.
Am 15.02.2015 um 12:20 schrieb Reindl Harald:
that's why we don't mix inbound and autobound mail
* SA is running on the MX
* mail is filtered and clean mail relayed over
100027 to the final server
* final server has "-o receive_override_options=no_milters" in master.cf
* the bayes is rsynced
Am 15.02.2015 um 01:29 schrieb LuKreme:
Spamass-milter is (as designed, I’m sure) checking outbound mail. When it does
this, SPF checks fail and a lot of outbound mail is getting scored as spam
because of it.
The domains in question *do* have SPF records
that's why we don't mix inbound and
Am 15.02.2015 um 01:29 schrieb LuKreme:
> Spamass-milter is (as designed, I’m sure) checking outbound mail. When it
> does this, SPF checks fail and a lot of outbound mail is getting scored as
> spam because of it.
works like designed
dont use spamass-milter for outbound ( or go the long way con
Spamass-milter is (as designed, I’m sure) checking outbound mail. When it does
this, SPF checks fail and a lot of outbound mail is getting scored as spam
because of it.
The domains in question *do* have SPF records.
--
Why can't you be in a good mood? How hard is it to decide to be in a
good m
On 12 Feb 2015, at 17:58 , Dave Pooser wrote:
> Also, I score
> blacklist_from at 80 points so an address that's both blacklisted and
> whitelisted will be effectively whitelisted, thanks to a net -20 score.
Quick stupid question:
Is this the right syntax in local.cf to change the scores for bla
20 matches
Mail list logo
