Hello,
I've got an email setup which includes Postfix as MTA, Amavisd-new as
content filter, Spamassassin for antispam work, Dovecot for Imap
services, all of which with the exception of Amavisd use a Mysql
database. Mail delivery, virtual users, and Dovecot with Sieve for
moving spam in to a dedi
On 14. feb. 2015 01.16.47 LuKreme wrote:
Heh. Nice one.
+1
i just hate anyone equal when it comes to spam :)
but i still like the python shows
But seriously, a working set of these pairs would be great to have. It is
surprising how much of the spam is faked from various companies.
prob
On 13 Feb 2015, at 07:55 , Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On 13. feb. 2015 02.35.30 LuKreme wrote:
>
>> > whitelist_auth *@bankofamerica.com
>> > blacklist_from *@bankofamerica.com
>
>> Care you share your list, Dave?
>
> blacklist_from *@*.*
> whitelist_auth *@*.*
>
> untested :)
Heh. Nice one.
B
On 02/13/2015 05:29 PM, Dave Pooser wrote:
On 2/13/15, 4:27 PM, "Dave Wreski" wrote:
I thought I would send this on to you instead of broadcasting it.
You thought wrong :-)
Yeah, thanks
One too many emails after reading spam for the last twelve hours
dave
On 2/13/15, 4:27 PM, "Dave Wreski" wrote:
>I thought I would send this on to you instead of broadcasting it.
You thought wrong :-)
--
Dave Pooser
Cat-Herder-in-Chief, Pooserville.com
Hi John,
I thought I would send this on to you instead of broadcasting it.
I just received an email with an odd URL. It contained what appears to
be a non-ASCII character simulating a period, or at least one that is
not part of the standard set.
http://pastebin.com/x6TGNpD7
http://harvardde
My question has been misunderstood as commentary on SPF, etc.
It is not about SPF, I'm just trying to steer the question towards a
spamassassin tag that can be triggered.
I found a solution with my own rule.
I wasn't sure whether the SA rules referring to 'from' header were
actually meaning sender
On Fri, 13 Feb 2015, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On 13. feb. 2015 02.35.30 LuKreme wrote:
> whitelist_auth *@bankofamerica.com
> blacklist_from *@bankofamerica.com
Care you share your list, Dave?
blacklist_from *@*.*
whitelist_auth *@*.*
untested :)
ROFL.
Thanks, Benny, that's a nice wa
On 13. feb. 2015 02.35.30 LuKreme wrote:
> whitelist_auth *@bankofamerica.com
> blacklist_from *@bankofamerica.com
Care you share your list, Dave?
blacklist_from *@*.*
whitelist_auth *@*.*
untested :)
more info on whitelist_auth is in perldoc
On Thu, 2015-02-12 at 19:48 -0500, Alex Regan wrote:
> So shouldn't there be a rule for a rule that claims to come from Amazon
> but does not pass through any of its servers?
>
In some cases the Message-ID header can help: I have a rule that adds a
point or two to messages with my own Message-ID
Am 13.02.2015 um 03:49 schrieb LuKreme:
Yeah, in my own email NYT hits bayes_00.
I just switched to using spamass-milter:
/usr/local/sbin/spamass-milter -f -p /var/run/spamass-milter.sock -u spamd -r 9
-- -s 5242880
And it occurs to me that maybe it is not picking up bayes properly.
Should I t
11 matches
Mail list logo