spam from creative gtlds

2014-12-19 Thread listsb-spamassassin
this was discussed a while back, in the context of tlds with names of colors [red, blue, pink, etc]. recently, i'm getting spam from the "rocks" tld [i can share further detail if it's of interest]. what ultimately happened with the color tlds, in terms of spamassassin? was there a ruleset mo

Re: SA rule - URIBL_SBL-XBL scores false positive?

2014-12-19 Thread Jose Borges Ferreira
Acording to this https://twitter.com/spamhaus/status/545139926191575040 , 2 days ago Spamhaus DBL had an issue and flagged all .net . Perhaps it's related somehow . José Borges Ferreira On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Dharma Monie wrote: > > Anyone experinced SA rule URIBL (spammhaus/local.cf

Re: SA rule - URIBL_SBL-XBL scores false positive?

2014-12-19 Thread RW
On Fri, 19 Dec 2014 14:12:47 +0100 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > >On 12/19/2014 12:28 PM, Dharma Monie wrote: > >>The rule is shipped with SA by default, > >>regarding if it?s enabled by default - checking against that exact > >>uribl - I?m affraid I can?t provide you with a satisfying answer >

Re: SA rule - URIBL_SBL-XBL scores false positive?

2014-12-19 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 12/19/2014 12:28 PM, Dharma Monie wrote: The rule is shipped with SA by default, regarding if it’s enabled by default - checking against that exact uribl - I’m affraid I can’t provide you with a satisfying answer there, as I was not the initial admin configuring “this” file. On 19.12.14 12

Re: SA rule - URIBL_SBL-XBL scores false positive?

2014-12-19 Thread Axb
On 12/19/2014 12:28 PM, Dharma Monie wrote: Good question there. The rule is shipped with SA by default, regarding if it’s enabled by default - checking against that exact uribl - I’m affraid I can’t provide you with a satisfying answer there, as I was not the initial admin configuring “this”

Re: SA rule - URIBL_SBL-XBL scores false positive?

2014-12-19 Thread Dharma Monie
Good question there. The rule is shipped with SA by default, regarding if it’s enabled by default - checking against that exact uribl - I’m affraid I can’t provide you with a satisfying answer there, as I was not the initial admin configuring “this” file. Other than that, this check have been a

Re: SA rule - URIBL_SBL-XBL scores false positive?

2014-12-19 Thread Axb
On 12/19/2014 11:55 AM, Dharma Monie wrote: Anyone experinced SA rule URIBL (spammhaus/local.cf) score false positive? —> uridnsbl URIBL_SBLXBL sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org. TXT body URIBL_SBLXBL eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_SBLXBL’) <— All of a sudden, it scores 40-5

SA rule - URIBL_SBL-XBL scores false positive?

2014-12-19 Thread Dharma Monie
Anyone experinced SA rule URIBL (spammhaus/local.cf) score false positive? —> uridnsbl URIBL_SBLXBL sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org. TXT body URIBL_SBLXBL eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_SBLXBL’) <— All of a sudden, it scores 40-50% false positive, latest 2-3 days. All summin

Re: Is there an official port of SpamAssassin to Windows ?

2014-12-19 Thread Christian Laußat
Am 2014-12-19 11:37, schrieb Ben Stover: Is there an official port of SpamAssassin to Windows ? You can build it yourself: https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/InstallingOnWindows Or you can use a precompiled version, e.g.: http://www.jam-software.de/spamassassin/ -- Christian Laußat https://

Is there an official port of SpamAssassin to Windows ?

2014-12-19 Thread Ben Stover
Is there an official port of SpamAssassin to Windows ?