dns: sendto() to [127.0.0.1]:53 failed: Connection refused, no more alternatives

2014-10-31 Thread Chris
I am still fighting this issue. This has been going on since Wednesday morning since there was an update to the kernel. I have no idea what to check or even where to begin. If someone could help I'd really appreciate it. -- Chris KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C 31.11°N 97.89°W (Elev. 1092 ft) 19:45:32 u

Re: Bogus SPF +all (was Re: dnssec / dane)

2014-10-31 Thread Paul Stead
Hmm, serves me right for not reading correctly, doesn't look like SENDERDOMAIN is a tag that is set - is there another tag I could use? DKIMDOMAIN exists, but no use On 31/10/14 16:05, Paul Stead wrote: have noticed I get the following from a debug: dbg: check: tagrun - tag SENDERDOMAIN is st

Re: Bogus SPF +all (was Re: dnssec / dane)

2014-10-31 Thread Paul Stead
I have noticed I get the following from a debug: dbg: check: tagrun - tag SENDERDOMAIN is still blocking action 1 -- Am I using the right tag? On 31/10/14 13:51, Paul Stead wrote: Tried to send this before, seemed to not go through, apologies if two copies get through eventually... Would som

Re: Bogus SPF +all (was Re: dnssec / dane)

2014-10-31 Thread Paul Stead
Tried to send this before, seemed to not go through, apologies if two copies get through eventually... Would something along the lines of this work as a quick rule until a fully fledged plugin comes around? askdns __LOC_SPF_ALL _SENDERDOMAIN_ TXT /^v=spf1.+\+all$/ askdns __LOC_SPF_NONE _SENDE

Re: Bogus SPF +all (was Re: dnssec / dane)

2014-10-31 Thread Paul Stead
Would something along the lines of this work as a quick rule until a fully fledged plugin comes around? askdns __LOC_SPF_ALL _SENDERDOMAIN_ TXT /v=spf1.+\+all/ askdns __LOC_SPF_NONE _SENDERDOMAIN_ TXT /v=spf1.+\-all/ askdns __LOC_SPF_LARGESUB _SENDERDOMAIN_ TXT /^v=spf(.+\/[1-6]\s)/ I can't see

Re: CYA .link

2014-10-31 Thread Axb
On 10/31/2014 01:30 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: On 10/31/2014 2:56 AM, Axb wrote: On 10/30/2014 11:32 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: On 10/29/2014 5:17 PM, Axb wrote: Ok so it looks like it's committed in rules/60_whitelist.cf which should go out in tonight's rule update if all goes according to

Re: CYA .link

2014-10-31 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 10/31/2014 2:56 AM, Axb wrote: On 10/30/2014 11:32 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: On 10/29/2014 5:17 PM, Axb wrote: Ok so it looks like it's committed in rules/60_whitelist.cf which should go out in tonight's rule update if all goes according to plan, yes? Yep... if all goes according to pla