Re: How is it that my X-Spam-Status is no, but my header gets marked with

2014-10-25 Thread John Hardin
On Sat, 25 Oct 2014, Cathryn Mataga wrote: On 10/25/2014 9:29 PM, John Hardin wrote: On Sat, 25 Oct 2014, Cathryn Mataga wrote: > Received: from ecuador.junglevision.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by > ecuador.junglevision.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s9P2o1ZZ026032 > (version=

Re: How is it that my X-Spam-Status is no, but my header gets marked with

2014-10-25 Thread Cathryn Mataga
On 10/25/2014 9:29 PM, John Hardin wrote: On Sat, 25 Oct 2014, Cathryn Mataga wrote: Received: from ecuador.junglevision.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ecuador.junglevision.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s9P2o1ZZ026032 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=25

Re: How is it that my X-Spam-Status is no, but my header gets marked with

2014-10-25 Thread John Hardin
On Sat, 25 Oct 2014, Cathryn Mataga wrote: Received: from ecuador.junglevision.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ecuador.junglevision.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s9P2o1ZZ026032 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 1

Re: How is it that my X-Spam-Status is no, but my header gets marked with

2014-10-25 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Sat, 2014-10-25 at 20:06 -0700, Cathryn Mataga wrote: > > Okay, here's another header.Shows X-Xpam-Status as no. > > In local.cf I changed to this, just to be sure. > > rewrite_header Subject [SPAM][JUNGLEVISION SPAM CHECK] > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on >

Re: .link TLD spammer haven?

2014-10-25 Thread John Hardin
On Sun, 26 Oct 2014, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: On Fri, 2014-10-24 at 19:05 -0700, John Hardin wrote: uri__ALL_URI /.*/ tflags __ALL_URI multiple That seemingly straight-forward approach does not work in this case. The tflags multiple option does not make uri rules match mult

Re: How is it that my X-Spam-Status is no, but my header gets marked with

2014-10-25 Thread Cathryn Mataga
Okay, here's another header.Shows X-Xpam-Status as no. In local.cf I changed to this, just to be sure. rewrite_header Subject [SPAM][JUNGLEVISION SPAM CHECK] Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on ecuador.junglevision.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam

Re: .link TLD spammer haven?

2014-10-25 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Fri, 2014-10-24 at 19:05 -0700, John Hardin wrote: > On Fri, 24 Oct 2014, John Hardin wrote: > > > On Sat, 25 Oct 2014, Martin Gregorie wrote: > > > > > Less obviously, it doesn't seem to matter whether you write the rule > > > as /\.link\b/ or /\.link$/ - both give identical matches. Both m