Re: URIBL_RHS_DOB high hits

2014-10-11 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Sun, 2014-10-12 at 02:58 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 12.10.2014 um 02:20 schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann: > > You have exactly one false positive listing. That is not even close to > > "hit randomly". > > well, i can't verify the other hits because don't have access to other > users email -

Re: URIBL_RHS_DOB high hits

2014-10-11 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 12.10.2014 um 02:20 schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann: On Sun, 2014-10-12 at 01:28 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 12.10.2014 um 01:09 schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann: it hits again and i doubt that sourceforge is a new domain However, what I am much more annoyed about is your rambling, claiming

Re: URIBL_RHS_DOB high hits

2014-10-11 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Sun, 2014-10-12 at 01:28 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 12.10.2014 um 01:09 schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann: > > it hits again and i doubt that sourceforge is a new domain > > However, what I am much more annoyed about is your rambling, claiming > > DOB would list sourceforge.net -- and by t

Re: URIBL_RHS_DOB high hits

2014-10-11 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 12.10.2014 um 01:09 schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann: On Sun, 2014-10-12 at 00:29 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 12.10.2014 um 00:23 schrieb Reindl Harald: Am 12.10.2014 um 00:18 schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann: On Sat, 2014-10-11 at 23:40 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: it hits again and i doubt t

Re: URIBL_RHS_DOB high hits

2014-10-11 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Sun, 2014-10-12 at 00:29 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 12.10.2014 um 00:23 schrieb Reindl Harald: > > Am 12.10.2014 um 00:18 schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann: > > > On Sat, 2014-10-11 at 23:40 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > > it hits again and i doubt that sourceforge is a new domain > > > > w

Re: URIBL_RHS_DOB high hits

2014-10-11 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 12.10.2014 um 00:23 schrieb Reindl Harald: Am 12.10.2014 um 00:18 schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann: On Sat, 2014-10-11 at 23:40 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: it hits again and i doubt that sourceforge is a new domain whatever the reason is - for me enough to disable it forever Jumping to conclus

Re: URIBL_RHS_DOB high hits

2014-10-11 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 12.10.2014 um 00:18 schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann: On Sat, 2014-10-11 at 23:40 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: it hits again and i doubt that sourceforge is a new domain whatever the reason is - for me enough to disable it forever Jumping to conclusions, aren't you? yes - the conclusion is tha

Re: URIBL_RHS_DOB high hits

2014-10-11 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Sat, 2014-10-11 at 23:40 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > it hits again and i doubt that sourceforge is a new domain > whatever the reason is - for me enough to disable it forever Jumping to conclusions, aren't you? > Oct 11 23:34:43 mail-gw spamd[28079]: spamd: result: . 0 - > BAYES_50,CUST_DN

Re: URIBL_RHS_DOB high hits

2014-10-11 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 09.10.2014 um 07:33 schrieb Axb: Found it. dig A a.support-intelligence.net +short 208.67.172.17 dig A b.support-intelligence.net +short 209.23.235.22 dig emms.com.dob.sibl.support-intelligence.net @208.67.172.17 +short 127.0.0.2 The mirror on 208.67.172.17 is not in sync Shoot

Re: Regarding mass-check access

2014-10-11 Thread Ian Zimmerman
On Fri, 10 Oct 2014 16:19:39 -0400, staticsafe wrote: > I sent an email to priv...@spamassassin.apache.org regarding access to > mass-check back on the first of September. Is anybody out there? :) So did I, on August 31, to be precise. Crickets for me, too. -- Please *no* private copies of ma