On 10/09/2014 03:06 AM, David Jones wrote:
On 10/07/2014 01:12 PM, Axb wrote:
On 10/07/2014 01:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 07.10.2014 um 12:53 schrieb Axb:
On 10/07/2014 12:40 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 06.10.2014 um 19:06 schrieb Axb:
On 10/06/2014 07:01 PM, David Jones wrote:
Anyone
Hi,
> /usr/local/bin/sa-update && /usr/local/bin/sa-compile &&
> /usr/local/etc/rc.d/sa-spamd restart
>
> the only time spamd would restart is if sa-update AND sa-compile were
> successfully completed, correct?
Sorry for jumping in the conversation... I have solved that issue by
calling sa-u
On Wednesday, October 8, 2014, 6:31:08 PM, Martin confabulated:
> On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 16:46 -0600, Amir Caspi wrote:
>> On Oct 8, 2014, at 4:23 PM, Duane Hill wrote:
>> >
>> > No. && is a way of chaining commands together. Your cron says run
>> > sa-update and then restart spamd. In
> On 10/07/2014 01:12 PM, Axb wrote:
> > On 10/07/2014 01:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Am 07.10.2014 um 12:53 schrieb Axb:
> >>> On 10/07/2014 12:40 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 06.10.2014 um 19:06 schrieb Axb:
> > On 10/06/2014 07:01 PM, David Jones wrote:
> >> Anyone e
On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 16:46 -0600, Amir Caspi wrote:
> On Oct 8, 2014, at 4:23 PM, Duane Hill wrote:
> >
> > No. && is a way of chaining commands together. Your cron says run
> > sa-update and then restart spamd. In other words, when sa-update
> > finishes running, regardless if t
Looks like I'm late to the party. :-)
--- Amir
thumbed via iPhone
> On Oct 8, 2014, at 4:46 PM, Amir Caspi wrote:
>
>> On Oct 8, 2014, at 4:23 PM, Duane Hill wrote:
>>
>> No. && is a way of chaining commands together. Your cron says run
>> sa-update and then restart spamd. In othe
On Wednesday, October 8, 2014, 5:38:20 PM, John wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Oct 2014, Duane Hill wrote:
>> No. && is a way of chaining commands together.
> ...where the second command is only executed if the first command exited
> with a zero status. && stops on failure.
> try:
> true && echo "wa
On Oct 8, 2014, at 4:23 PM, Duane Hill wrote:
>
> No. && is a way of chaining commands together. Your cron says run
> sa-update and then restart spamd. In other words, when sa-update
> finishes running, regardless if there was an update applied or not,
> restart spamd.
Unless I
On Wed, 8 Oct 2014 17:23:36 -0500
Duane Hill wrote:
> No. && is a way of chaining commands together.
&& is a logical AND
> Your cron says run
> sa-update and then restart spamd. In other words, when sa-update
> finishes running, regardless if there was an update applied or not,
>
On Wednesday, October 8, 2014, 5:31:07 PM, Dave wrote:
> On 2014-10-08 15:23, Duane Hill wrote:
>> No. && is a way of chaining commands together. Your cron says run
>> sa-update and then restart spamd. In other words, when sa-update
>> finishes running, regardless if there was an up
On Wed, 8 Oct 2014, Duane Hill wrote:
No. && is a way of chaining commands together.
...where the second command is only executed if the first command exited
with a zero status. && stops on failure.
try:
true && echo "was true"
false && echo "was false"
If you want it to execute t
On 2014-10-08 15:23, Duane Hill wrote:
No. && is a way of chaining commands together. Your cron says run
sa-update and then restart spamd. In other words, when sa-update
finishes running, regardless if there was an update applied or not,
restart spamd.
I thought that ; would chain
On Wednesday, October 8, 2014, 3:11:06 PM, LuKreme wrote:
>> On 08 Oct 2014, at 04:56 , Duane Hill wrote:
>>
>> On Tuesday, October 7, 2014, 10:56:54 PM, LuKreme wrote:
>>
>>> On 07 Oct 2014, at 11:45 , Jari Fredrisson wrote:
I ran sa-update & sa-compile.
>>
>>> Should sa-compile be run
Is it possible to have a site-wide bayes AND individual bayes for some users
(or all users)?
And, if not, is it generally better to do sitewide?
And, is it possible to take all the individual bayes and combine them into a
stitewide db?
--
"You've got to dance like nobody's watching." - Kathy
On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 15:48 -0500, Robert A. Ober wrote:
> > On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 15:11:44 -0500 Robert A. Ober wrote:
> > > *Yes, my test messages and SPAM hit the rules but ignore the score.*
> What is the easiest way to know what score is applied per rule? Neither
> the server log nor the hea
On 10/08/2014 10:48 PM, Robert A. Ober wrote:
On 9/22/14 4:20 PM, RW wrote:
On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 15:11:44 -0500
Robert A. Ober wrote:
*Yes, my test messages and SPAM hit the rules but ignore the score.*
What score does it have?
Could it be that the score got set after spamd was restarted?
On 9/22/14 4:20 PM, RW wrote:
On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 15:11:44 -0500
Robert A. Ober wrote:
*Yes, my test messages and SPAM hit the rules but ignore the score.*
What score does it have?
Could it be that the score got set after spamd was restarted?
__
What is the
> On 08 Oct 2014, at 04:56 , Duane Hill wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, October 7, 2014, 10:56:54 PM, LuKreme wrote:
>
>> On 07 Oct 2014, at 11:45 , Jari Fredrisson wrote:
>>> I ran sa-update & sa-compile.
>
>> Should sa-compile be run after sa-update?
>
>> I have a crontab entry:
>
>> 16 1 * *
On 2014-10-07 16:58, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
I monitor positive and negative responses, for IP based DNS BLs, I use
>the following by default:
>
>127.0.0.1 should not be listed.
>127.0.0.2 should be listed.
Depending on how the DNSBL implements such static test-points, they
might not be affec
On 10/8/2014 2:58 PM, Nick wrote:
Thanks Bowie, sure enough the actual spamd process was running as a different
user. The file to configure the user it runs under is
/etc/syscofnig/spamassassin
But it still should have used the bayes_path option from local.cf
regardless of the user. Unless
Thanks Bowie, sure enough the actual spamd process was running as a different
user. The file to configure the user it runs under is
/etc/syscofnig/spamassassin
So I'm now seeing Bayes show up in the mail headers!
Many thanks,
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:bowie_bai
On 10/8/2014 2:13 PM, Nick wrote:
In postfix, I'm calling spamassassin with the 2 lines:
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd -o
content_filter=spamassassin
spamassassin unix - n n - - pipe flags=R user=spamd
argv=/usr/bin/spamc -e /usr/sbin/
In postfix, I'm calling spamassassin with the 2 lines:
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd -o
content_filter=spamassassin
spamassassin unix - n n - - pipe flags=R user=spamd
argv=/usr/bin/spamc -e /usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -f ${sender} ${recipien
On October 8, 2014 5:56:54 AM LuKreme wrote:
16 1 * * * /usr/local/bin/sa-update && /usr/local/etc/rc.d/sa-spamd
restart
should I add an sa-compile call?
If the plugin for precompiled body rules is enabled yes, check plugins in
pre file
On 10/8/2014 11:15 AM, Nick wrote:
I seem to be catching a lot more SPAM, but no matter what I try, it seems Bayes isn't getting
utilized. I have ~700 SPAMS and 2400 HAMS. When I run "spamassassin -D --lint" (as the
same user Postfix is running spamc as), it comes back with a report that seems
On 10/08/2014 05:15 PM, Nick wrote:
I seem to be catching a lot more SPAM, but no matter what I try, it
seems Bayes isn't getting utilized. I have ~700 SPAMS and 2400 HAMS.
When I run "spamassassin -D --lint" (as the same user Postfix is
running spamc as), it comes back with a report that seems t
I seem to be catching a lot more SPAM, but no matter what I try, it seems Bayes
isn't getting utilized. I have ~700 SPAMS and 2400 HAMS. When I run
"spamassassin -D --lint" (as the same user Postfix is running spamc as), it
comes back with a report that seems to utilize Bayes, but when normal e-
On Tue, 7 Oct 2014 21:56:54 -0600
LuKreme wrote:
> On 07 Oct 2014, at 11:45 , Jari Fredrisson wrote:
> > I ran sa-update & sa-compile.
>
> Should sa-compile be run after sa-update?
>
> I have a crontab entry:
>
> 16 1 * * * /usr/local/bin/sa-update
> && /usr/local/etc/rc.d/sa-spamd restar
On 10/7/2014 4:04 PM, A. Schulze wrote:
Kevin A. McGrail:
We are working on solutions expected for the 3.4.1 release on ~9/30.
are the any updates on the release plan?
I'm working on an RC as we speak. I'm not happy with the TLD solution,
yet and Ivo had a flood so we have some delay on som
On Tuesday, October 7, 2014, 10:56:54 PM, LuKreme wrote:
> On 07 Oct 2014, at 11:45 , Jari Fredrisson wrote:
>> I ran sa-update & sa-compile.
> Should sa-compile be run after sa-update?
> I have a crontab entry:
> 16 1 * * * /usr/local/bin/sa-update &&
> /usr/local/etc/rc.d/sa-spamd resta
30 matches
Mail list logo
