> On 30 Aug 2014, at 15:32 , RW wrote:
>
> On Sat, 30 Aug 2014 08:23:02 -0600
> LuKreme wrote:
>
>> if test -d "$J_PATH"; then
>>MYFIND=`find $J_PATH/ -type f -mtime -7|grep -v dovecot`
>
> mtime may not be the best choice. Ideally what you want is the the time
> since the spam was moved
Yes, it does work great when you have the bayes filter turned on and you
take the time to feed it. And that means you have to feed the
learner both ham and spam and setup reliable sources for those.
Unfortunately if Bayes is not turned on, it does not catch more than
around 60-70% of spam. A
after two days running SA for the first two test-domains with a
well trained bayes for the global milter-user: impressive!
the few crap making it through poscreen RBL scroing is detected
0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version
0.000 0 1389
On Sat, 30 Aug 2014 08:23:02 -0600
LuKreme wrote:
> if test -d "$J_PATH"; then
> MYFIND=`find $J_PATH/ -type f -mtime -7|grep -v dovecot`
mtime may not be the best choice. Ideally what you want is the the time
since the spam was moved to Junk, rather than the time since it was
delivered. Wh
On 30 Aug 2014, at 07:49 , LuKreme wrote:
> MYFIND= `find $H_PATH/cur -type f -mtime -7`
> if [ -n $MYFIND ]; then
> /usr/local/bin/sa-learn --ham -u ${i} $MYFIND
> fi
Doh!
if [ -n “$MYFIND” ]; then
or
if test -n “$MYFIND”; then
Sigh. Feeling extra stupid this Saturday morning.
It wor
The following command seems to get stuck if there is no result from the find.
Any suggestions on how to avoid passing an empty find result to spamd?
sa-learn --ham -u ${i} `find /home/${i}/Maildir/.notspam -type f -mtime -7`
(where user $i has no emails in notspam that are new in the last 7 day
On 29 Aug 2014, at 20:52 , jdebert wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 11:41:48 +0200 Michael Opdenacker
> wrote:
>> I find it hard to believe I'm the only one getting spam in Chinese
>> characters ;)
>
> And "legitimate" messages as well. (Here, at least.) BLocking merely
> messages have more than ju
