On 27.08.14 17:07, Alex wrote:
I've set up a local URI DNSBL and I believe there are some FPs that I'd
like to identify. I've currently set up amavisd to set $sa_tag_level_deflt
at a value low enough that it always produces the X-Spam-Status header on
every email.
you can work around this by co
On 27.08.14 17:06, btb wrote:
we have a system [zimbra] where users can select a message in the mua
interface and click a spam or not spam button. this generates a
message [containing the selected message] which is ultimately
delivered to a mailbox. i intend on retrieving these messages via
On Wed, 2014-08-27 at 21:37 -0400, Alex wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 6:18 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann
> wrote:
> > The URIs [1] are automatically added to the uridnsbl rule's description
> > for _REPORT_ and _SUMMARY_ template tags. The latter is identical to the
> > additional summary at the en
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 6:18 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2014-08-27 at 17:07 -0400, Alex wrote:
> > I've set up a local URI DNSBL and I believe there are some FPs that
> > I'd like to identify. I've currently set up amavisd to set
> > $sa_tag_level_deflt at a value low enough t
On Aug 27, 2014, at 18.13, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> --On Wednesday, August 27, 2014 6:06 PM -0400 btb
> wrote:
>
>> hi-
>>
>> we have a system [zimbra] where users can select a message in the mua
>> interface and click a spam or not spam button. this generates a message
>> [containing t
On Wed, 2014-08-27 at 17:07 -0400, Alex wrote:
> I've set up a local URI DNSBL and I believe there are some FPs that
> I'd like to identify. I've currently set up amavisd to set
> $sa_tag_level_deflt at a value low enough that it always produces the
> X-Spam-Status header on every email.
>
> It wi
--On Wednesday, August 27, 2014 6:06 PM -0400 btb
wrote:
hi-
we have a system [zimbra] where users can select a message in the mua
interface and click a spam or not spam button. this generates a message
[containing the selected message] which is ultimately delivered to a
mailbox. i intend o
Hi all,
I'm using spamassassin-3.4 with amavisd-2.9.1. I think there's a chance
this is more of an amavisd question, but I think it's related enough to
post here.
I've set up a local URI DNSBL and I believe there are some FPs that I'd
like to identify. I've currently set up amavisd to set $sa_tag
hi-
we have a system [zimbra] where users can select a message in the mua
interface and click a spam or not spam button. this generates a message
[containing the selected message] which is ultimately delivered to a
mailbox. i intend on retrieving these messages via imap and feeding
sa-learn
Since you are mentioning 'Out of office' messages
Is anybody else got in trouble due to this 'fantastic'
auto responder feature? Especially when these email
are generated by an Exchange server.
Just curious, since the last week one of our mail
server (for outbound traffic) got listed in one
On 8/27/2014 11:56 AM, Kris Deugau wrote:
*sigh*
Just got a FP report...
... about an Out of Office message...
... generated by Outlook 15...
... which, among other things, seems to go to great lengths to look like
spam, by way of the HTML formatting overkill that hits a local rule for
HTML c
*sigh*
Just got a FP report...
... about an Out of Office message...
... generated by Outlook 15...
... which, among other things, seems to go to great lengths to look like
spam, by way of the HTML formatting overkill that hits a local rule for
HTML comments over 32K long.
*headdesk*
Someone
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> Works for me.
> Also verified the 3.3.2 (and 3.3.0 for that matter) svn tag version, in
> addition to my local 3.3 branch above. Same result, works for me.
I stand corrected (and confirmed locally).
-kgd
13 matches
Mail list logo
