Re: OT -postfix config

On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 18:56:48 -0400 "Joe Acquisto-j4" wrote: > Sorry to be OT. > > > Clue by four anyone? Tutorial page? > > Your best chance of getting help is on the postfix list. You can subscribe at http://www.postfix.org/lists.html they will also gladly help if clue-by-four are need

Re: OT -postfix config

On 8/20/2014 5:56 PM, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote: > Sorry to be OT. > > I thought this would be simple, but I am getting muddled, at this time of day. > Have setup a postfix host to accept email from various (local) hosts and > forward. The initial idea was to simply create a list of people for whom

OT -postfix config

Sorry to be OT. I thought this would be simple, but I am getting muddled, at this time of day. Have setup a postfix host to accept email from various (local) hosts and forward. The initial idea was to simply create a list of people for whom to forward email to another domain (translating the

Re: Delays with Check_Bayes

On 21/08/14 09:00, John Hardin wrote: > > Are you open to the possibility of upgrading to 3.4.0 and using the > Redis backend for Bayes? (Just offering an alternative.) > We just last week moved over to 3.4.0 with a central Redis backend with 6 spamd servers spread over USA and Europe. Bit of a st

Re: Delays with Check_Bayes

On Wed, 2014-08-20 at 13:38 -0700, redtailjason wrote: > We are seeing about 4000-7000 delayed messages per day. We do utilize a > dedicated MySQL Server for the Bayes and all 8 scanners share it. Please let > me know if this does not fully clarify our setup for you. So we're talking about 1% of

Re: Delays with Check_Bayes

On Wed, 20 Aug 2014, redtailjason wrote: We are seeing about 4000-7000 delayed messages per day. We do utilize a dedicated MySQL Server for the Bayes and all 8 scanners share it. Are you open to the possibility of upgrading to 3.4.0 and using the Redis backend for Bayes? (Just offering an alt

Re: Delays with Check_Bayes

We are seeing about 4000-7000 delayed messages per day. We do utilize a dedicated MySQL Server for the Bayes and all 8 scanners share it. Please let me know if this does not fully clarify our setup for you. Has anyone heard of a configuration where the transactions are written to a file (ie text

Re: KAM rules keep me giggling

On 8/20/2014 3:34 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote: What poison pills are they ;) Someone suggested using kam and I'm happy now. I figure they are not with SA spirit that no one rule should make that happen but... yeah. One helluva rules! :) We're always curious how our rules work for other people

KAM rules keep me giggling

What poison pills are they ;) Someone suggested using kam and I'm happy now. I figure they are not with SA spirit that no one rule should make that happen but... yeah. One helluva rules! -- jarif.bit signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Help determining what is causing mails being marked as Spam

El 20/08/2014 19:55, John Hardin escribió: On Wed, 20 Aug 2014, Nicolás wrote: El 20/08/2014 15:29, Axb escribió: get fcRDNS ...OVH lets you set a correct rdns for you hostname. Ok, already done that, waited a few hours and now the 'correct' DNS host appears in the header, but is still mar

Re: Delays with Check_Bayes

On Wed, 2014-08-20 at 06:15 -0700, redtailjason wrote: > Hello and good morning. We are running into some delays that we are trying to > pin down a root cause for. > > Below are some examples. Within the examples, you can see that the > check_bayes: scan is consuming most of the timing. Does anyo

Re: Help determining what is causing mails being marked as Spam

On Wed, 20 Aug 2014, Nicolás wrote: El 20/08/2014 15:29, Axb escribió: get fcRDNS ...OVH lets you set a correct rdns for you hostname. Ok, already done that, waited a few hours and now the 'correct' DNS host appears in the header, but is still marked as spam. Any other idea? Please post

Re: Help determining what is causing mails being marked as Spam

El 20/08/2014 15:29, Axb escribió: On 08/20/2014 04:24 PM, Nicolás wrote: The only one tip I have right now is that the reverse DNS query of the server's resolves to a different host than the one sent in EHLO, but in that case I don't know how to avoid that since the hosting where the dedicated

Re: Delays with Check_Bayes

Thank you for the clarification, sorry about that. Below is the updated information: sa-learn --dump magic 0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version 0.000 02687726 0 non-token data: nspam 0.000 0 846578 0 non-token data:

Re: Delays with Check_Bayes

On Wed, 2014-08-20 at 08:51 -0700, redtailjason wrote: > The initial post was data extracted from mail.log on the scanner using cat > /var/log/mail.log | grep check_bayes while logged as administrator. It doesn't matter what user greps the logs. It was Amavis generating the logs. Thus, for debug

Re: Delays with Check_Bayes

On Wed, 2014-08-20 at 07:35 -0700, redtailjason wrote: > Here is the dump from one of the scanners: > > netset: cannot include 127.0.0.1/32 as it has already been included > 0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version > 0.000 0613 0 non-token

Re: Delays with Check_Bayes

On 20. aug. 2014 17.36.39 redtailjason wrote: $ spamassassin --lint -D bayes Aug 20 07:54:53.816 [6955] warn: netset: cannot include 127.0.0.1/32 as it has already been included rfc 1700 is already in default sa config, tanks for that to developpers :) May miss rfc 1918 defined in lokal.cf,

Re: Delays with Check_Bayes

AXB, The initial post was data extracted from mail.log on the scanner using cat /var/log/mail.log | grep check_bayes while logged as administrator. -- View this message in context: http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/Delays-with-Check-Bayes-tp111067p111081.html Sent from the SpamAssass

Re: Delays with Check_Bayes

On 08/20/2014 05:35 PM, redtailjason wrote: Below is the output that you are seeking: $ spamassassin --lint -D bayes Aug 20 07:54:53.816 [6955] warn: netset: cannot include 127.0.0.1/32 as it has already been included Aug 20 07:54:54.415 [6955] dbg: bayes: learner_new self=Mail::SpamAssassin::Pl

Re: Delays with Check_Bayes

Do not have enough HAM to kick on bayes. -- Jeremy McSpadden Flux Labs | http://www.fluxlabs.net | Endless Solutions Office : 850-250-5590x501 | Cell : 850-890-2543 | Fax : 850-254-2955 On Aug 20, 2014, at 10:36 AM, "redtailjason" mailto:ja...@redtailtechnology.com>>

Re: Delays with Check_Bayes

Below is the output that you are seeking: $ spamassassin --lint -D bayes Aug 20 07:54:53.816 [6955] warn: netset: cannot include 127.0.0.1/32 as it has already been included Aug 20 07:54:54.415 [6955] dbg: bayes: learner_new self=Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Bayes=HASH(0x382ddd0), bayes_store_modu

Re: Delays with Check_Bayes

On Wed, 20 Aug 2014, redtailjason wrote: Thank you for your response! Our Bayes is MySQL. Currently, the expiry runs via cron job to run during low volume times. Does the MySQL log say anything suggestive? Here is the dump from one of the scanners: netset: cannot include 127.0.0.1/32 as it

Re: Need help with setting up MySQL storage for SA

Hi. I did test a similar configuration a while ago and had the same problem. If you take a look at this thread on the mailing list: http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/Bayes-vars-records-on-MySQL-not-created-automatically-td104615.html you'll see it was a problem of running 'sa-learn --sy

Re: Delays with Check_Bayes

On 08/20/2014 04:35 PM, redtailjason wrote: Thank you for your response! Our Bayes is MySQL. Currently, the expiry runs via cron job to run during low volume times. Here is the dump from one of the scanners: netset: cannot include 127.0.0.1/32 as it has already been included 0.000 0

Re: Delays with Check_Bayes

Thank you for your response! Our Bayes is MySQL. Currently, the expiry runs via cron job to run during low volume times. Here is the dump from one of the scanners: netset: cannot include 127.0.0.1/32 as it has already been included 0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db

Re: Help determining what is causing mails being marked as Spam

On 08/20/2014 04:24 PM, Nicolás wrote: The only one tip I have right now is that the reverse DNS query of the server's resolves to a different host than the one sent in EHLO, but in that case I don't know how to avoid that since the hosting where the dedicated server is located automatically ass

Help determining what is causing mails being marked as Spam

Hi all, I know this is not necessarily related to SpamAssasin itself, but I'm having a hard time trying to make my sent mails (from an own domain) not being marked as Spam on Gmail, so I was wondering if someone of you could have a look at the headers below and find out a reason why is my mai

Need help with setting up MySQL storage for SA

Hi, I'm using Spamassassin in a virtual user environment. To store preferences like settings, Bayes and AWL for each user I'm trying to set up a MySQL storage. I created the MySQL tables according the instructions from the files awl_mysql.sql, bayes_mysql.sql, README.awl, README.bayes, REA

Re: sa-learn site-wide bayes on Redis

I so love to posters. On 08/20/2014 03:33 PM, Matteo Dessalvi wrote: Ok, perfect! Thanks a lot! This is what I want to know and I was not so sure about. I may be wrong but it looks to me the fact that tools like sa-learn can access transparently the backends configured for SA is not exactly

Re: sa-learn site-wide bayes on Redis

Ok, perfect! Thanks a lot! This is what I want to know and I was not so sure about. I may be wrong but it looks to me the fact that tools like sa-learn can access transparently the backends configured for SA is not exactly clear from the docs. It would be great if the wiki maintainers could add

Re: Delays with Check_Bayes

On 08/20/2014 03:15 PM, redtailjason wrote: Hello and good morning. We are running into some delays that we are trying to pin down a root cause for. Below are some examples. Within the examples, you can see that the check_bayes: scan is consuming most of the timing. Does anyone have any suggests

Delays with Check_Bayes

Hello and good morning. We are running into some delays that we are trying to pin down a root cause for. Below are some examples. Within the examples, you can see that the check_bayes: scan is consuming most of the timing. Does anyone have any suggests on what to look at? We use 3.3.2. We have ei

Re: sa-learn site-wide bayes on Redis

bayes_store_module Mail::SpamAssassin::BayesStore::Redis tells SA to use the Redis backend. To sa-learn this becomes transparent, as with any other backed (DBD,SDBM,SQL) bayes_redis.cf shows what parameters are mandatory/optional On 08/20/2014 03:02 PM, Matteo Dessalvi wrote: No, unfortunat

Re: sa-learn site-wide bayes on Redis

No, unfortunately it does not help me. I already have a proper config file for SA to access Redis as backend and most of the configurations are done automatically through a Chef cookbook (Redis included). In the docs you pointed me there's nothing about the interaction between sa-learn and Redis.

Re: sa-learn site-wide bayes on Redis

On 08/20/2014 02:25 PM, Matteo Dessalvi wrote: Hi all. I am managing a bunch of Linux MTAs which are placed in front of some Exchange servers. In such a configuration the Bayes filter is deployed site-wide. For a new deployment of these servers I am planning to use Redis as a centralized backe

sa-learn site-wide bayes on Redis

Hi all. I am managing a bunch of Linux MTAs which are placed in front of some Exchange servers. In such a configuration the Bayes filter is deployed site-wide. For a new deployment of these servers I am planning to use Redis as a centralized backend (previously the bayes db were just files save

Re: FW: Tons of spam getting through

On Tue, 19 Aug 2014, Greg Ledford wrote: What exactly are SA headers supposed to look like? On 19.08.14 13:05, John Hardin wrote: SA headers look like this: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.138 tagged_above=-100 required=5 tests=[MISSING_MID=0.14, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.0