Re: "colors" TLDs in spam

2014-07-31 Thread Axb
On 08/01/2014 01:34 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: On 7/31/2014 7:17 PM, Axb wrote: if (version >= 3.004000) score URI_HOST_IN_BLACKLIST 15.0 blacklist_uri_host blue blacklist_uri_host red # blacklist_uri_hostgreen # blacklist_uri_hostblue # blacklist_uri_hostblack endif Theoretically, l

RE: duplicate key value violates unique constraint "awl_pkey"

2014-07-31 Thread Ivo Truxa
Hello everybody, I am sorry, in the last weeks I have been out of reach and did not have the occasion to follow the messages regarding TxRep, and see now there were some issues raised. In the meantime I've got also some private emails with bug reports and suggestions, implemented some of them, a

Re: "colors" TLDs in spam

2014-07-31 Thread Dave Warren
On 2014-07-31 16:34, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: Theoretically, legitimate mail could use these TLDs? is your theory that they are new enough that you are just blocking? They could, but like .info and .biz, there will be a handful of legitimate users and mostly just spam and junk. To me, it's

Re: "colors" TLDs in spam

2014-07-31 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 7/31/2014 7:17 PM, Axb wrote: if (version >= 3.004000) score URI_HOST_IN_BLACKLIST 15.0 blacklist_uri_host blue blacklist_uri_host red # blacklist_uri_hostgreen # blacklist_uri_hostblue # blacklist_uri_hostblack endif Theoretically, legitimate mail could use these TLDs? is your theo

Re: Problem with rules not being parsed I think

2014-07-31 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Thu, 2014-07-31 at 19:02 -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > On 7/31/2014 5:41 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > > A missing description is not an error, not even a lint warning. > > Yes, it is a warning (though in my defense I was using "error" > generically. Hah, that's actually news to me! H

Re: Problem with rules not being parsed I think

2014-07-31 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 7/31/2014 5:41 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: On Thu, 2014-07-31 at 17:34 -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: Put it in a different CF and comment out a description and look for an error that a description is missing. A missing description is not an error, not even a lint warning. Yes, it is

Re: RBL effectiveness (was Re: Ready to throw in the towel on email providing...)

2014-07-31 Thread Noel Butler
On 31/07/2014 11:36, Dave Warren wrote: There is a difference: Gmail is a very major source of wanted, legitimate mail. Most "may 'n pa run outback country dialup ISPs" are not. Most mail to most clients are a "very major source of wanted mail" Again, playing favourites is plain wrong, and i

Re: duplicate key value violates unique constraint "awl_pkey"

2014-07-31 Thread Benny Pedersen
On July 30, 2014 9:33:07 PM Joe Quinn wrote: TxRep is currently in trunk with instructions for migrating from AWL, if you want to try and reproduce the bug. i have tried to keep up on gentoo with sa 3.4 with is sadly not in portage yet, so i begined make it into my own overlay to have it sel

"colors" TLDs in spam

2014-07-31 Thread David B Funk
FYI: I recently started seeing "colors" TLDs in spam. EG:From: "Choice Home Warranty" and URIs: http://xerophthalmia.red/158b1a930024e51c42cd8_a5b5da53 worth a rule? anybody seeing this stuff in ham? -- Dave Funk University of Iowa College of En

Re: Problem with rules not being parsed I think

2014-07-31 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Thu, 2014-07-31 at 17:34 -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > Put it in a different CF and comment out a description and look for an > error that a description is missing. A missing description is not an error, not even a lint warning. -- char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x

Re: Problem with rules not being parsed I think

2014-07-31 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Thu, 2014-07-31 at 19:59 +, Chris Brandstetter wrote: > body NWU_YOLASITE /yolasite\.com/i This (and the other similar ones) really should better be a uri rule. And this particular one be merged with the almost duplicating uri rule just 20 lines below. > # Yolasite URI rule > uri NWU_

Re: Problem with rules not being parsed I think

2014-07-31 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 7/31/2014 5:08 PM, Chris Brandstetter wrote: If showed it being loaded "Jul 31 15:43:07.794 [20903] dbg: config: read file /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf” Is there any way to list what rules are being loaded? Like a list all available rules type of thing? Not that I'm aware of, no. Put i

Re: Problem with rules not being parsed I think

2014-07-31 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Thu, 2014-07-31 at 21:08 +, Chris Brandstetter wrote: > If showed it being loaded "Jul 31 15:43:07.794 [20903] dbg: config: > read file /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf” Is there any way to list > what rules are being loaded? Like a list all available rules type of > thing? No, but you can

Re: Problem with rules not being parsed I think

2014-07-31 Thread Chris Brandstetter
If showed it being loaded "Jul 31 15:43:07.794 [20903] dbg: config: read file /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf” Is there any way to list what rules are being loaded? Like a list all available rules type of thing? Chris Brandstetter System Administrator Nebraska Wesleyan University Office Phon

Re: Problem with rules not being parsed I think

2014-07-31 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 7/31/2014 3:59 PM, Chris Brandstetter wrote: We are running spam assassin 3.3.1 with Postfix. So I have added some rules to mark as spam yolasite, wix, etc…. as we have been getting besieged by them. My thing is these rules seem not to be loading. When I do a spamassassin —lint I don’t g

Problem with rules not being parsed I think

2014-07-31 Thread Chris Brandstetter
We are running spam assassin 3.3.1 with Postfix. So I have added some rules to mark as spam yolasite, wix, etc…. as we have been getting besieged by them. My thing is these rules seem not to be loading. When I do a spamassassin —lint I don’t get any errors. When I do spamassassin —lint -D I

Re: spamassassin at 100 percent CPU

2014-07-31 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 7/31/2014 3:19 PM, Noah wrote: Hi there, what are some things to check with spamassassin commonly running at 100 percent? I used apt-get to reinstall of spamassassin 3.3.2-2ubuntu1 and no cure. nothing in the syslog that seems relevant. Ubuntu 12.04 Linux 3.15.4-x86_64 What's your spam

Re: spamassassin at 100 percent CPU

2014-07-31 Thread Joe Quinn
On 7/31/2014 3:19 PM, Noah wrote: Hi there, what are some things to check with spamassassin commonly running at 100 percent? I used apt-get to reinstall of spamassassin 3.3.2-2ubuntu1 and no cure. nothing in the syslog that seems relevant. Ubuntu 12.04 Linux 3.15.4-x86_64 Cheers, It depen

spamassassin at 100 percent CPU

2014-07-31 Thread Noah
Hi there, what are some things to check with spamassassin commonly running at 100 percent? I used apt-get to reinstall of spamassassin 3.3.2-2ubuntu1 and no cure. nothing in the syslog that seems relevant. Ubuntu 12.04 Linux 3.15.4-x86_64 Cheers,

Re: Ready to throw in the towel on email providing...

2014-07-31 Thread Dave Warren
On 2014-07-31 07:39, David F. Skoll wrote: Gmail's spam filtering is at least as good as stock SpamAssassin, and honestly I think it's better. You can achieve equal quality with SpamAssassin if you're willing to work at it. But it does take a lot of work. This is the real difference with Gmai

Re: Ready to throw in the towel on email providing...

2014-07-31 Thread David F. Skoll
On Tue, 29 Jul 2014 18:05:11 -0700 Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > Eventually something will supplany MSFT and yes, even > > Google will fade eventually. > People used to say that about General Motors & Ford Motor Company 100 > years ago. Except for unconscionable intervention by the US and Canadi

Re: RBL effectiveness (was Re: Ready to throw in the towel on email providing...)

2014-07-31 Thread Matthias Leisi
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 1:06 AM, Noel Butler wrote: > There is no such thing as 'too big' when it comes to handling the shit storm > of spam that gets spewed out of some organisations, and I'll treat Gmail and > the likes the same as a ma 'n pa run outback country dialup ISP, there is At dnswl.