Re: Unexpected missing rule name, failure of spams/spamd to output X-Spam headers

2014-05-26 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Sat, 2014-05-24 at 12:34 +0100, Martin Gregorie wrote: > On Sat, 2014-05-24 at 05:04 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > LATER: This morning I reran some failing examples after rebooting the > test machine. No change, so I tried a few stripped-down runs, i.e. I > started spamd via a test script

Re: spamd log level

2014-05-26 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Sun, 2014-05-25 at 07:58 +0200, Alex Andreotti wrote: > On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 09:04:29PM +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > > Ironically, the uninteresting noise you asked to get rid of shows, there > > may be some issue with your setup. (Granted, or a deliberate config > > decision.) > > >

Re: autolearn_force

2014-05-26 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
I suggest to spend some time reading the relevant documentation. In particular the M::SA::Conf and AutoLearnThreshold docs. http://spamassassin.apache.org/doc/ On Sat, 2014-05-24 at 22:12 -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > > So, now I am really confused. I think I did everything right in > > user_

Re: Blank line rules

2014-05-26 Thread Axb
On 05/26/2014 09:20 PM, James B. Byrne wrote: On a related note, what is the difference between 'body' and 'rawbody' rules? http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/WritingRules

Enom strikes back?

2014-05-26 Thread James B. Byrne
I checked the whois of several domains that I recorded hitting us with spam last week. I reported this to the registrar, Enom, Inc. As of today all the domains that that I checked had their owner changed to N4S GROUP COMMUNICATION (N4SGROUPCOMM.COM). So it seems something caused a change at Enom

Re: Blank line rules

2014-05-26 Thread James B. Byrne
On Thu, May 22, 2014 17:50, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > > > There's another issue with your approach of different rules matching "up > to n" occurrences and "more than n". The first will always match in > addition, if the latter matches. > > If the desired behavior is mutually exclusive matching

Re: SPF checking

2014-05-26 Thread Axb
On 05/26/2014 06:49 PM, Fredrik Lindgren wrote: Hello, I'm having an issue in getting SPF checking to work the way I want and just wanted to see if you maybe had some input on how to achieve this, or what I'm doing wrong. We're running SA to filter incoming mail, as well as to police outgoing S

SPF checking

2014-05-26 Thread Fredrik Lindgren
Hello, I'm having an issue in getting SPF checking to work the way I want and just wanted to see if you maybe had some input on how to achieve this, or what I'm doing wrong. We're running SA to filter incoming mail, as well as to police outgoing SPAM. This is an ISP type setup, where end use