Re: spamd log level

2014-05-24 Thread Alex Andreotti
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 09:04:29PM +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 11:30 +0200, Alex Andreotti wrote: > > is there a way to configure spamd (without patching it) to log only > > errors? > > AFAIK there is no such option. > > Though isn't that exactly what log levels are

Re: autolearn_force

2014-05-24 Thread Ian Zimmerman
> So, now I am really confused. I think I did everything right in > user_prefs: > > bayes_auto_learn 1 > bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam -2.00 > bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam 6.00 > bayes_auto_learn_on_error 0 > > [snip] > > tflags URIBL_DBL_SPAM autolearn_force > tflags URIBL_JP_SURB

Re: autolearn_force

2014-05-24 Thread Ian Zimmerman
On Thu, 22 May 2014 15:54:42 +0100 RW wrote: Ian> But in fact this is a per-test setting, a subcategory of tflags. Ian> Do I have to specify it separately for every test? Why? RW> The point is to set it for a small number of rules that are RW> sufficiently strong as to guarantee there will be n

Re: Unexpected missing rule name, failure of spams/spamd to output X-Spam headers

2014-05-24 Thread Martin Gregorie
On Sat, 2014-05-24 at 05:04 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > On Sat, 2014-05-24 at 03:28 +0100, Martin Gregorie wrote: > > On Sat, 2014-05-24 at 02:36 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > > > I've looked down the list a couple of times and didn't see anything I > > thought would affect it due to