On 2014-04-08 11:17, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 4/8/2014 2:15 PM, Dave Warren wrote:
On 2014-04-08 03:56, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 4/8/2014 1:16 AM, Dave Warren wrote:
On 2014-04-07 19:23, Thomas Harold wrote:
NOTE: New masscheck contributors are now being accepted since
about 2012-08-09.
On 4/8/2014 2:15 PM, Dave Warren wrote:
On 2014-04-08 03:56, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 4/8/2014 1:16 AM, Dave Warren wrote:
On 2014-04-07 19:23, Thomas Harold wrote:
NOTE: New masscheck contributors are now being accepted since
about 2012-08-09.
Is that supposed to say "now being" or "not be
On 2014-04-08 03:56, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 4/8/2014 1:16 AM, Dave Warren wrote:
On 2014-04-07 19:23, Thomas Harold wrote:
NOTE: New masscheck contributors are now being accepted since about
2012-08-09.
Is that supposed to say "now being" or "not being"?
I'm assuming "now being" since th
On 04/08/2014 07:50 PM, Chip M. wrote:
Starting Apr 5, about _HALF_ of our spam volume is a
new pump and dump campaign for stock symbol "RCHA".
As well as the high volume, there are several noteworthy
characteristics:
- victim account name is used as the sender/From account name
- very clean
On Mon, 07 Apr 2014 17:22:37 -0400
Thomas Harold wrote:
> On 4/6/2014 11:25 PM, jdebert wrote:
> >
> > This explains why SA is not catching any spam here? After updating
> > to updates 1584283 and then 1585021, all spam is being passed.
> > Nothing else was done. No other changes made.
> >
>
>
Starting Apr 5, about _HALF_ of our spam volume is a
new pump and dump campaign for stock symbol "RCHA".
As well as the high volume, there are several noteworthy
characteristics:
- victim account name is used as the sender/From account name
- very clean HTML
- very few hits on non-DNS/RBL Spa
On Mon, 7 Apr 2014, Dave Warren wrote:
On 2014-04-07 19:23, Thomas Harold wrote:
> NOTE: New masscheck contributors are now being accepted since about
> 2012-08-09.
Is that supposed to say "now being" or "not being"?
I'm assuming "now being" since there are regular mentions of a need for
On 4/8/2014 1:16 AM, Dave Warren wrote:
On 2014-04-07 19:23, Thomas Harold wrote:
NOTE: New masscheck contributors are now being accepted since about
2012-08-09.
Is that supposed to say "now being" or "not being"?
I'm assuming "now being" since there are regular mentions of a need
for ham co
