Howdy, I'm running SA on a RHEL 6.5 machine.
Using spamassassin-3.3.1-3.el6.x86_64, pyzor-0.5.0-3.el6.noarch,
spamass-milter-0.3.2-3.el6.x86_64 and milter-greylist-4.5.7-1.el6.x86_64
(if that matters).
The relevant parts of my sendmail.mc are:
INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`spamassassin',
`S=unix:/var/run/s
On 5 Mar 2014 22:40:37 +0800
Neil Schwartzman wrote:
> On Mar 5, 2014, at 9:38 PM, RW wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 05 Mar 2014 08:18:39 -0500
> > Joe Quinn wrote:
> >
> >
> >> By the way, I recommend you inform Spamhaus of the FP on bitly.
> >
> > It's not an FP, Spamhaus lists it as a redirector, wh
On 3/5/2014 9:57 AM, Neil Schwartzman wrote:
On Mar 5, 2014, at 10:40 PM, Neil Schwartzman wrote:
Yeah. An abused, and abusive redirector. They only deal with abuse
Monday-Friday, 9:00-17:00.* They never break links, but put an interstitial in
between the victim and the payload. Gee thanks.
On Mar 5, 2014, at 10:40 PM, Neil Schwartzman wrote:
> Yeah. An abused, and abusive redirector. They only deal with abuse
> Monday-Friday, 9:00-17:00.* They never break links, but put an interstitial
> in between the victim and the payload. Gee thanks.
BTW spamhaus aren’t the only ones fed up
On Mar 5, 2014, at 9:38 PM, RW wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Mar 2014 08:18:39 -0500
> Joe Quinn wrote:
>
>
>> By the way, I recommend you inform Spamhaus of the FP on bitly.
>
> It's not an FP, Spamhaus lists it as a redirector, which it is. As has
> already been pointed-out it scores 0.001 in SA.
Yea
Guys,
I've got trouble implementing whitelist in spam assassin, either 3.3.2 or
3.4.0 - with simscan and qmail. I started using whitelist couple of months
before with 3.3.2 and it looked as if they were working - at least until
last february 2014. I've implemented whitelist_from, whitelist_from_rc
On 3/5/2014 8:36 AM, Dieter Braun wrote:
Thanks a lot for this hint - that's been it!
This had happened: The files /etc/mail/spamassassin/*.pre, that
already existed, were not replaced by the new versions. Only the new
file v340.pre was copied to /etc/mail/spamassassin.
After moving the exis
On Wed, 05 Mar 2014 08:18:39 -0500
Joe Quinn wrote:
> By the way, I recommend you inform Spamhaus of the FP on bitly.
It's not an FP, Spamhaus lists it as a redirector, which it is. As has
already been pointed-out it scores 0.001 in SA.
Thanks a lot for this hint - that's been it!
This had happened: The files /etc/mail/spamassassin/*.pre, that already
existed, were not replaced by the new versions. Only the new file
v340.pre was copied to /etc/mail/spamassassin.
After moving the existing *.pre files somewhere else and copyin
On 03/05/2014 02:18 PM, Joe Quinn wrote:
On 3/5/2014 7:18 AM, Ben wrote:
On 05/03/2014 05:47, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On 2014-03-04 18:52, Ben wrote:
Just for my reference, is there a way to affect the score rather than
skip completely ?
score FOO (1) (1) (1) (1)
add one point to FOO rule
On 3/5/2014 7:18 AM, Ben wrote:
On 05/03/2014 05:47, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On 2014-03-04 18:52, Ben wrote:
Just for my reference, is there a way to affect the score rather than
skip completely ?
score FOO (1) (1) (1) (1)
add one point to FOO rule
it also works with negative scores that wi
On 05/03/2014 05:47, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On 2014-03-04 18:52, Ben wrote:
Just for my reference, is there a way to affect the score rather than
skip completely ?
score FOO (1) (1) (1) (1)
add one point to FOO rule
it also works with negative scores that will subtract scores
post sample i
12 matches
Mail list logo
