am 12.02.14 03:50 schrieb Kevin A. McGrail :
Jim, what did you comment out more specifically?
Jim Knuth wrote:
am 12.02.14 02:50 schrieb Benny Pedersen :
On 2014-02-12 02:48, Jim Knuth wrote:
really? Thank you. :) For now I have deactivated the entry
in v
Jim, what did you comment out more specifically?
Jim Knuth wrote:
>am 12.02.14 02:50 schrieb Benny Pedersen :
>
>> On 2014-02-12 02:48, Jim Knuth wrote:
>>
>>> really? Thank you. :) For now I have deactivated the entry
>>> in v340.pre.
>>
>> if you have found workaround aswell post it to the tick
am 12.02.14 03:20 schrieb Mark Martinec :
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On 2014-02-12 02:33, Jim Knuth wrote:
> Util.pm and AskDNS.pm both are available. What must
> I do? Any ideas or solution greatly appreciated. Thanks.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7007
as i read it you h
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On 2014-02-12 02:33, Jim Knuth wrote:
> Util.pm and AskDNS.pm both are available. What must
> I do? Any ideas or solution greatly appreciated. Thanks.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7007
as i read it you have found a bug, with i created a ticket for
am 12.02.14 02:50 schrieb Benny Pedersen :
On 2014-02-12 02:48, Jim Knuth wrote:
really? Thank you. :) For now I have deactivated the entry
in v340.pre.
if you have found workaround aswell post it to the ticket :)
i might be wroung
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=70
am 12.02.14 02:50 schrieb Benny Pedersen :
On 2014-02-12 02:48, Jim Knuth wrote:
really? Thank you. :) For now I have deactivated the entry
in v340.pre.
if you have found workaround aswell post it to the ticket :)
i might be wroung
yes, I'll do that.
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
with kind
On 2014-02-12 02:48, Jim Knuth wrote:
really? Thank you. :) For now I have deactivated the entry
in v340.pre.
if you have found workaround aswell post it to the ticket :)
i might be wroung
am 12.02.14 02:39 schrieb Benny Pedersen :
On 2014-02-12 02:33, Jim Knuth wrote:
Util.pm ans AskDNS.pm both are available. What must
I do? Any ideas or solution greatly appreciated. Thanks.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7007
as i read it you have found a bug, with i
On 2014-02-12 02:33, Jim Knuth wrote:
Util.pm ans AskDNS.pm both are available. What must
I do? Any ideas or solution greatly appreciated. Thanks.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7007
as i read it you have found a bug, with i created a ticket for now
am 11.02.14 20:21 schrieb Kevin A. McGrail :
On behalf of the project, I am please to announce the availability of
Apache SpamAssassin version 3.4.0.
The Press Release is available on the ASF Blog at http://s.apache.org/G6b
& Release Notes follow. Downloads are available at
http://spamassassin
On behalf of the project, I am please to announce the availability of
Apache SpamAssassin version 3.4.0.
The Press Release is available on the ASF Blog at http://s.apache.org/G6b
& Release Notes follow. Downloads are available at
http://spamassassin.apache.org/downloads.cgi with some mirror issue
On 2014-02-11 20:59, RW wrote:
Actually I find BAYES_99 to be so reliable that I'd be happy to score
it above 5.0. Other have made similar comments too.
there is a number of ways to punish spf pass domains for spamming :)
blacklist_from *@foo.example.org
and for the bayes on could make anoth
On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 20:22:00 +0100
Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On 2014-02-11 18:25, Andy Jezierski wrote:
>
> > They don't really hit on any rules
> >
> > X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.5 required=5.0
> > tests=BAYES_99,HTML_MESSAGE,
> >
> > SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
>
On 2014-02-11 18:25, Andy Jezierski wrote:
They don't really hit on any rules
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99,HTML_MESSAGE,
SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
version=3.4.0-rc5
bayes is seeing it as spam, so it might be in vain :)
well if ba
On 2/11/2014 2:02 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 11 Feb 2014, Amir Caspi wrote:
I could release the rules publicly but that may end up backfiring,
per above. John, Kevin, what do you guys think?
Spammers can install SpamAssassin as easily as anyone else, that's a
known risk. Any rules we pr
On Tue, 11 Feb 2014, Amir Caspi wrote:
I could release the rules publicly but that may end up backfiring, per
above. John, Kevin, what do you guys think?
Spammers can install SpamAssassin as easily as anyone else, that's a known
risk. Any rules we provide they can potentially test against th
On Feb 11, 2014, at 10:25 AM, Andy Jezierski wrote:
> They don't really hit on any rules
A number of image spams have certain template formats and I've written custom
rules to catch many... however, I've been hesitant to release those rules
publicly since spammers could just change their t
I've been seeing a pretty big increase in image spam over the last month
or so. I remember using FuzzyOCR years ago when image spam was a much
bigger problem.
Since FuzzyOCR hasn't been maintained in several years, is there an
alternative that would work? Or is there another way to try and cat
18 matches
Mail list logo
