On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 08:14:20PM -0700, Amir 'CG' Caspi wrote:
>
> What's the way that I can inject the bayes-identified tokens (hammy or
> spammy) into my SA headers, so that I can try to debug what's causing this
> problem?
Manual debug:
spamassassin -t -D bayes < message | grep bayes:
(of co
Thanks, that helps a bit:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.6 required=5.0 tests=[AWL=-0.040,
RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SO_FROM_HJPC=0.65, SO_HELO_LDOM=0.65,
SO_LOCAL_FROM=-0.1, SO_NOT_FROM_RP=2.5, SPF_FAIL=0.919] autolearn=no
X-Spam-Level:
But I am still missing these two lines:
X-
On Thu, January 9, 2014 9:46 pm, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> Unfortunately, well, for the scumbags, the shorter it gets, the less
> likely it is to be understood. Fallen for. Or even understood to be
> actual language.
Well, not really true, because of the rising resurgence of spammers using
imag
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 20:14 -0700, Amir 'CG' Caspi wrote:
> On Thu, January 9, 2014 6:20 pm, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > Even the most effective results I have ever seen on a non-personal
> > attack is merely getting the Bayes classification to a neutral. And that
> > was not a "regular" text to
On Thu, January 9, 2014 6:20 pm, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> Even the most effective results I have ever seen on a non-personal
> attack is merely getting the Bayes classification to a neutral. And that
> was not a "regular" text token, but includes mail headers. And a biased
> Bayes database towa
On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 02:20:33 +0100
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> Even the most effective results I have ever seen on a non-personal
> attack is merely getting the Bayes classification to a neutral. And
> that was not a "regular" text token, but includes mail headers. And a
> biased Bayes database
On Sun, 2014-01-05 at 01:56 +, Mark Tully wrote:
> One pattern of messages which I’ve noticed slip through are those which
> have a multipart and have a block of bayes poisoning text in the
> text/plain part, with the real spam payload in the text/html part.
> What I’m seeing is that the text/
On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 07:29 -0600, Mark Chaney wrote:
> I am using spamassassin standalone and I am trying to figure out how to
> duplicate this format that I would normally get from my servers that
> user amavis or mailscanner. How can I get a format like so? Ive read the
> manual, but havent r
On Jan 6, 2014, at 8:45 AM, hospice admin wrote:
> ... its not like NOMINET give a darn about spam, is it??
Nominet are arguably one of the few registrars that very much do care about
spam, AFAIK. I know several staffers and former staffers who job it was to deal
with messaging and other type
Hello Martin:
THANKS SO MUCH!!!
I have had modified your code, so being useful at my platform with
MySQL... also adding some code for wildcards, as *@domain.tld.
. needed to cpan install and use Email::Address
.
my ($mailaddr) = Email::Address->parse($aa);
my $dominio = $mailaddr->hos
> From: hospice...@outlook.com
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Detecting very recently registered domain names
> Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 13:45:07 +
>
>
>> Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 12:26:08 +
>> F
11 matches
Mail list logo
