Re: External IP is list inTrusted

2013-11-28 Thread 杨枭
I have known the reason why SA take the ip as a trusted ip. When a mail whose authentication method is esmtp included the received-header, SA will take the ip as a trusted ip. See the SpamAssassin/Message/Metadata/Received.pm: # if we find authentication tokens in the received header we can

Re: External IP is list inTrusted

2013-11-28 Thread Henrik K
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 10:48:42AM +0800, wrote: > > but I did not set any ip in the trusted_networks, why SA take the > 124.73.143.235 as a trusted ip? In what case not "trusting" internal ip would make sense? What is it that you are really trying to achieve? http://spamassassin.apache.org

uribl problem

2013-11-28 Thread Nick Edwards
Hi, have a problem with our internal uribl urirhsblINT_URI uri.int.lan. A bodyINT_URI eval:check_uridnsbl('INT_URI') describeINT_URI Contains a URI listed in internal URIBL tflags INT_URI net score INT_URI 3 this rule performs lookups if in normal t

External IP is list inTrusted

2013-11-28 Thread 杨枭
Hi all: I'm using SA-3.2.3 to test a spam, the following is the dbg message: *Nov 29 09:51:19.982 [23076] dbg: received-header: authentication method esmtpa* *Nov 29 09:51:19.982 [23076] dbg: received-header: relay 124.73.143.235 trusted? yes internal? yes msa? no* *Nov 29 09:51:19.982 [2307

Re: SA not correctly classifying spam

2013-11-28 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Thu, 2013-11-28 at 17:02 -0500, Kris Deugau wrote: > Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > > UNPARSABLE_RELAY was happening because I modify the headers of > > every message sent through my server in order to anonymize the > > sender's IP address; Do NOT do that. SA absolutely must have the full, co

Re: SA not correctly classifying spam

2013-11-28 Thread Martin Gregorie
On Thu, 2013-11-28 at 19:33 -0200, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > Having said that, my SA is still missing lots of spams. For example, > take a look at: > > > This doesn't score much better here (2.9) but this is a type of spam I don't see. However, t

Re: SA not correctly classifying spam

2013-11-28 Thread Kris Deugau
Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > On Monday, November 11 2013, I wrote: > >> Hi there, > > Hi, again! > > I am sorry to ressurect this thread, but after some time, investigation > and fixes, I would like to share what I did and ask for more opinions. > > First, I have fixed the previous warnings t

Re: SA not correctly classifying spam

2013-11-28 Thread Axb
On 11/28/2013 10:33 PM, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: On Monday, November 11 2013, I wrote: Hi there, Hi, again! I am sorry to ressurect this thread, but after some time, investigation and fixes, I would like to share what I did and ask for more opinions. First, I have fixed the previous war

Re: SA not correctly classifying spam

2013-11-28 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
On Monday, November 11 2013, I wrote: > Hi there, Hi, again! I am sorry to ressurect this thread, but after some time, investigation and fixes, I would like to share what I did and ask for more opinions. First, I have fixed the previous warnings that I was seeing on the messages. URI_BLOCKED w

Re: Warning from users@spamassassin...

2013-11-28 Thread Dave Warren
On 2013-11-27 21:01, Geoffrey Leach wrote: The ezmlm gnome has sent me a helpful message, which begins: Messages to you from the users mailing list seem to have been bouncing. I've attached a copy of the first bounce message I received. I would very much like to unders