Re: Restarting spamd?

2013-11-10 Thread LuKreme
On 10 Nov 2013, at 09:46 , RW wrote: > On Sun, 10 Nov 2013 08:19:36 -0700 > LuKreme wrote: > >> After I run sa-learn, I noticed that spamd did not apply the changed >> rules. > > I assume that everywhere you have written sa-learn, you actually mean > sa-update. doh. Yes, I did. >

Re: Positive / Negative

2013-11-10 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
On Monday, November 11 2013, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > 'sa-learn --dump magic' still shows less than 200 nham / nspam, right? Yes, it does. > Until that issue is resolved, please keep the spam for potential further > post-receiving tests. Will certainly do. > Not strictly SA configuration,

Re: Positive / Negative

2013-11-10 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 00:34 -0200, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > On Sunday, November 10 2013, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > > Given you state below no spam has been identified yet, you're confusing > > terms. Gnah. I was falsely thinking "received" when I wrote "identified" there. > I don't think

Re: Positive / Negative

2013-11-10 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
On Sunday, November 10 2013, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > On Sun, 2013-11-10 at 03:32 -0200, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >> On Sunday, November 10 2013, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > >> For all messages that I received since I started using SA (about 20 >> messages, of which 5 were false-negatives

Positive / Negative (was: Re: spamc -L apparently not working properly)

2013-11-10 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Sun, 2013-11-10 at 03:32 -0200, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > On Sunday, November 10 2013, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > For all messages that I received since I started using SA (about 20 > messages, of which 5 were false-negatives, and the rest were > true-negatives), [...] Given you state b

Re: Authentication-Results

2013-11-10 Thread Benny Pedersen
Geoffrey Leach skrev den 2013-11-10 21:58: Are there any rules for analyzing Authentication-Results headers? you open a can of worms asking this :=) http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/Creating-new-rules-td105984.html well i still miss to see dmarc testing in sa subject is done if its

Authentication-Results

2013-11-10 Thread Geoffrey Leach
Are there any rules for analyzing Authentication-Results headers?

Re: Restarting spamd?

2013-11-10 Thread Benny Pedersen
RW skrev den 2013-11-10 17:46: On Sun, 10 Nov 2013 08:19:36 -0700 LuKreme wrote: After I run sa-learn, I noticed that spamd did not apply the changed rules. I assume that everywhere you have written sa-learn, you actually mean sa-update. # sa-update.sh sa-update sa-compile /etc/init.d/spamp

Re: Restarting spamd?

2013-11-10 Thread Benny Pedersen
LuKreme skrev den 2013-11-10 16:19: After I run sa-learn, I noticed that spamd did not apply the changed rules. hmm, sa-laern is bayes, not spamassassin rules, if you update rules then it must restart spamd If I setup sa-learn to run automatically, I need to setup spamd to restart afterward

Re: Restarting spamd?

2013-11-10 Thread RW
On Sun, 10 Nov 2013 08:19:36 -0700 LuKreme wrote: > After I run sa-learn, I noticed that spamd did not apply the changed > rules. I assume that everywhere you have written sa-learn, you actually mean sa-update. > If I setup sa-learn to run automatically, I need to setup spamd to > restart after

Re: Restarting spamd?

2013-11-10 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 11/10/2013 10:19 AM, LuKreme wrote: After I run sa-learn, I noticed that spamd did not apply the changed rules. If I setup sa-learn to run automatically, I need to setup spamd to restart afterwards, I suppose. What's a reasonable interval for running sa-learn out of crontab? (I have it setu

Restarting spamd?

2013-11-10 Thread LuKreme
After I run sa-learn, I noticed that spamd did not apply the changed rules. If I setup sa-learn to run automatically, I need to setup spamd to restart afterwards, I suppose. What's a reasonable interval for running sa-learn out of crontab? (I have it setup for weekly) Or should I be doing somet