On 10 Nov 2013, at 09:46 , RW wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Nov 2013 08:19:36 -0700
> LuKreme wrote:
>
>> After I run sa-learn, I noticed that spamd did not apply the changed
>> rules.
>
> I assume that everywhere you have written sa-learn, you actually mean
> sa-update.
doh. Yes, I did.
>
On Monday, November 11 2013, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> 'sa-learn --dump magic' still shows less than 200 nham / nspam, right?
Yes, it does.
> Until that issue is resolved, please keep the spam for potential further
> post-receiving tests.
Will certainly do.
> Not strictly SA configuration,
On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 00:34 -0200, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> On Sunday, November 10 2013, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > Given you state below no spam has been identified yet, you're confusing
> > terms.
Gnah. I was falsely thinking "received" when I wrote "identified" there.
> I don't think
On Sunday, November 10 2013, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-11-10 at 03:32 -0200, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
>> On Sunday, November 10 2013, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>
>> For all messages that I received since I started using SA (about 20
>> messages, of which 5 were false-negatives
On Sun, 2013-11-10 at 03:32 -0200, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> On Sunday, November 10 2013, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> For all messages that I received since I started using SA (about 20
> messages, of which 5 were false-negatives, and the rest were
> true-negatives), [...]
Given you state b
Geoffrey Leach skrev den 2013-11-10 21:58:
Are there any rules for analyzing Authentication-Results headers?
you open a can of worms asking this :=)
http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/Creating-new-rules-td105984.html
well i still miss to see dmarc testing in sa
subject is done if its
Are there any rules for analyzing Authentication-Results headers?
RW skrev den 2013-11-10 17:46:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2013 08:19:36 -0700
LuKreme wrote:
After I run sa-learn, I noticed that spamd did not apply the changed
rules.
I assume that everywhere you have written sa-learn, you actually mean
sa-update.
# sa-update.sh
sa-update
sa-compile
/etc/init.d/spamp
LuKreme skrev den 2013-11-10 16:19:
After I run sa-learn, I noticed that spamd did not apply the changed
rules.
hmm, sa-laern is bayes, not spamassassin rules, if you update rules then
it must restart spamd
If I setup sa-learn to run automatically, I need to setup spamd to
restart afterward
On Sun, 10 Nov 2013 08:19:36 -0700
LuKreme wrote:
> After I run sa-learn, I noticed that spamd did not apply the changed
> rules.
I assume that everywhere you have written sa-learn, you actually mean
sa-update.
> If I setup sa-learn to run automatically, I need to setup spamd to
> restart after
On 11/10/2013 10:19 AM, LuKreme wrote:
After I run sa-learn, I noticed that spamd did not apply the changed rules.
If I setup sa-learn to run automatically, I need to setup spamd to restart
afterwards, I suppose. What's a reasonable interval for running sa-learn out of
crontab? (I have it setu
After I run sa-learn, I noticed that spamd did not apply the changed rules.
If I setup sa-learn to run automatically, I need to setup spamd to restart
afterwards, I suppose. What's a reasonable interval for running sa-learn out of
crontab? (I have it setup for weekly)
Or should I be doing somet
12 matches
Mail list logo