On 17/10/13 09:03, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> We've done similar real time checks using Sendmail but seen this
> actually bring down Exchange Servers (more like bringing it to its
> knees from a resource perspective than actually crashing it) from the
> LDAP queries associated with these type of is
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 11:47 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
I'm not quite sure what you were intending to match.
On more mature reflection, neither am I! I should have said:
/^\s{0,80}\S{0,20}\s{0,80}$/
...which matches /^$/, or any message having a
On 10/16/2013 3:46 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 15:41:04 -0400
"Kevin A. McGrail" wrote:
So in the beginning for our issue, our firm implemented something
similar and it's documented at http://www.pccc.com/downloads/ldap/
thanks primarily to Brian Landers and his
work. This
On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 11:47 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> I'm not quite sure what you were intending to match.
>
On more mature reflection, neither am I! I should have said:
/^\s{0,80}\S{0,20}\s{0,80}$/
which should catch messages of 20 characters or less. I was in a hurry
(quite a bit of C to w
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 15:41:04 -0400
"Kevin A. McGrail" wrote:
> So in the beginning for our issue, our firm implemented something
> similar and it's documented at http://www.pccc.com/downloads/ldap/
> thanks primarily to Brian Landers and his
> work. This is a nice solution that uses LDAP an
On 10/16/2013 2:27 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
I think this is a deliberate strategy on the part of Microsoft. I
think they're making Exchange so complicated and such a PITA that
people give up and go to the cloud, ideally to Office 365. For many
small companies, going to the cloud probably makes
"David F. Skoll" 10/16/13 2:32 PM >>>
>. . . .as long as they don't mind
>paying extra and don't mind the NSA having access to their email. :)
>
>Regards,
>
>David.
Of course you mean "easier access" . . . ?
joe a.
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 10:52:08 -0700
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> Just be aware that Microsoft's "standard" is to use LDAP queries to
> the AD.
True, and we support that. But not everyone wants to open up their LDAP
to the outside world, even to a few outside IPs.
Furthermore, if you use Office 365
Just be aware that Microsoft's "standard" is to use LDAP queries to the
AD. Every major commercial antispam product does this and you will
save yourself a lot of work later when MS changes the next version of
Exchange to not support the 2525 hack. (which they could easily do)
if you do it that
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
) Email in question is at http://pastie.org/8403863; I put it
there so it would not harm anyone with its HTTP-Posting-URI header.
In my local.cf I have
ok_languages en
ok_locales en
add_header all Languages _LANGUAGES_
And have textcat enabled
On 10/16/2013 9:42 AM, David F. Skoll wrote:
On 16 Oct 2013 09:15:07 -0700
"Neil Schwartzman" wrote:
List verification. Many receiving sites will block after X bounces,
clean up your
you mean "their" list
list from 550s, and spam the real thing from another
botted IP.
And you know who
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 09:21:46 -0800
Kevin Miller wrote:
> So if I'm reading this right, milters such as smf-sav or milter-ahead
> will no longer be of any use?
You are reading it correctly. On our anti-spam service, we require
some sort of recipient validation so we don't go insane scanning
mess
On 10/16/2013 07:21 PM, Kevin Miller wrote:
So if I'm reading this right, milters such as smf-sav or milter-ahead will no
longer be of any use?
yep... One will have to be creative, start mantaining local rcpt list
copies, LDAP exports, etc - lottsa fun for all parties.
This also applies to
So if I'm reading this right, milters such as smf-sav or milter-ahead will no
longer be of any use?
...Kevin
--
Kevin Miller
Network/email Administrator, CBJ MIS Dept.
155 South Seward Street
Juneau, Alaska 99801
Phone: (907) 586-0242, Fax: (907) 586-4500
Registered Linux User No: 307357
On 10/16/2013 06:42 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
On 16 Oct 2013 09:15:07 -0700
"Neil Schwartzman" wrote:
List verification. Many receiving sites will block after X bounces,
clean up your list from 550s, and spam the real thing from another
botted IP.
And you know who we can thank [sic] for thi
) Email in question is at http://pastie.org/8403863; I put it
there so it would not harm anyone with its HTTP-Posting-URI header.
In my local.cf I have
ok_languages en
ok_locales en
add_header all Languages _LANGUAGES_
And have textcat enabled. Many emails, most recently in Chinese and
Span
On 16 Oct 2013 09:15:07 -0700
"Neil Schwartzman" wrote:
> List verification. Many receiving sites will block after X bounces,
> clean up your list from 550s, and spam the real thing from another
> botted IP.
And you know who we can thank [sic] for this mechanism of list verification?
Microsoft
List verification. Many receiving sites will block after X bounces, clean up
your list from 550s, and spam the real thing from another botted IP.
Neil Schwartzman
Executive Director
Coalition Against unsolicited Commercial Email
Tel :(303) 800-6345
Mob: (415) 361-0069
@cauce
On Oct 16, 2013
On 10/16/2013 04:58 PM, Marcio Humpris wrote:
In reply to axb...
about one word spam
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spamassassin-users/201308.mbox/browser
here is the sample http://pastebin.com/download.php?i=0D7tfsjf
Can you help with some regex pls?
This has two words :) and no S
On 10/16/2013 11:33 AM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 11:58 -0300, Marcio Humpris wrote:
Hi everyone
If I use digest mode how do I reply to a specific mail?
In reply to axb...
about one word spam
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spamassassin-users/201308.mbox/browser
h
On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 11:58 -0300, Marcio Humpris wrote:
> Hi everyone
>
> If I use digest mode how do I reply to a specific mail?
>
> In reply to axb...
>
> about one word spam
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spamassassin-users/201308.mbox/browser
>
> here is the sample http://paste
Dumb question here perhaps - how exactly would sending a single word
to a victim help a spammer? Why would they do it?
Ted
On 10/16/2013 8:33 AM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 11:58 -0300, Marcio Humpris wrote:
Hi everyone
If I use digest mode how do I reply to a specific mai
Hi everyone
If I use digest mode how do I reply to a specific mail?
In reply to axb...
about one word spam
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spamassassin-users/201308.mbox/browser
here is the sample http://pastebin.com/download.php?i=0D7tfsjf
Can you help with some regex pls?
Tks
>Operators of newsgroups which mirror/archive mailing
>lists, and allow posting from a web interface, are adding forged
>Received: headers before sending an email to the respective list
>server.
In what way are they forged? Do they contain addresses that doesn't match the
system adding the receiv
On 10/15/2013 09:03 PM, Florian Lindner wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 15. Oktober 2013, 07:19:01 schrieb Andreas Schulze:
>> Zitat von Florian Lindner :
>>> Since we move our server (and upgrade from oldstabe to stable) I want to
>>> reconsider how I organize mails serverside.
>>>
>>> Debian, MTA is postfi
25 matches
Mail list logo
