HI Axb,
But, we don't require A and NS lookups for a domain to query for it's
existence in URIBL, right? I don't see the point of doing the NS
lookups in URIBL module.
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Axb wrote:
> On 09/17/2013 06:59 AM, Abhijeet Rastogi wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Short Version
On 09/17/2013 06:59 AM, Abhijeet Rastogi wrote:
Hi all,
Short Version: See subject.
Long Version: Read below.
So far, I've got a nice feedback from the community, thanks for that.
I want to know why are DNS queries like URI-A and URI-NS done? For a
specific case that I'm trying to use, I want s
Hi all,
Short Version: See subject.
Long Version: Read below.
So far, I've got a nice feedback from the community, thanks for that.
I want to know why are DNS queries like URI-A and URI-NS done? For a
specific case that I'm trying to use, I want spamassassin to use just
DNSBL and nothing else.
I
On Tue, 17 Sep 2013, Olivier Nicole wrote:
(I am not sure if it would increase the spamines to have several
instances of the same bad word in a message).
It might. There are rules that consider more than N instances of a given
phrase (like you'd see on a pharma spam where there are per-pill p
> > My only restriction is that FuzzyOCR uses it's own list of spam words
> > instead of pushing back the decoded text to SA for SA to analyze.
> This is necessary because of the poor quality of the OCR. It's only going to
> be useful if the number of words you try to match against is very small.
On Tuesday, September 17, 2013 09:44:21 AM Olivier Nicole wrote:
> My only restriction is that FuzzyOCR uses it's own list of spam words
> instead of pushing back the decoded text to SA for SA to analyze.
This is necessary because of the poor quality of the OCR. It's only going to
be useful if th
Hi Alex,
> I'm hoping someone can help me with an image spam. I haven't seen one
> of these in a while, and I can't figure out how to catch them
> effectively.
>
> This one is probably now being caught by the RBLs, but I'm hoping
> there's some other characteristic within the email that can be us
On Mon, 2013-09-16 at 15:40 -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> On 9/15/2013 11:24 AM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> > On Sun, 2013-09-15 at 23:27 +0530, Blason rock wrote:
> >> I agree an wouldnt harm if I disable it as my smtp scanning is definitely
> >> running fine. What I was thinking about is does im
On 9/15/2013 11:24 AM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Sun, 2013-09-15 at 23:27 +0530, Blason rock wrote:
I agree an wouldnt harm if I disable it as my smtp scanning is definitely
running fine. What I was thinking about is does imap and pop3 AS scanning
only needed for ISP kindaa environment? Since I
John Hardin wrote:
> If you want to override the default behavior of SA to that degree, it's
> easier to change the config directory that SpamAssassin and spamd use
> with the -c option,
You mean -C (note capital). -c (lower-case) is to autocreate userprefs
files.
> so that none of the base r
> If you don't want to use the rules in the updates directory, why would you
> even need to run sa-update?
I wish I could. SpamAssassin dies with the message as below if I don't
run sa-update or move the directory '/var/lib/spamassassin'.
die "config: no rules were found! Do you need to run 'sa-
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.3.x/doc/
All spamd options documented in:
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.3.x/doc/spamd.txt
You'll have to go thru your .pre files to disable a bunch of plugins
Those rule hits your seeing now are very cheap and low scored.
On 09/16/2013 11:14 PM,
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 1:58 AM, Kris Deugau wrote:
> John Hardin wrote:
>
>
> Key arguments for spamd are -C (to specify the "default" rules path
> (overrides and combines DEF_RULES_DIR and LOCAL_STATE_DIR) and
> --siteconfig for your "site" config (could probably be pointed somewhere
> empty but
On 09/16/2013 10:55 PM, Abhijeet Rastogi wrote:
If you don't want to use the rules in the updates directory, why would you
even need to run sa-update?
I wish I could. SpamAssassin dies with the message as below if I don't
run sa-update or move the directory '/var/lib/spamassassin'.
die "config
Bart Schaefer writes:
> On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
>> I've been trying to `teach' SA to spam from ham in my mail system.
>>
>> I've made it thru two main learning sessions where I ran around 450
>> msgs (each time) thru sa-learn spam/ham and yet SA is still incapable
>>
That's because SA no longer ships with rules in the source kit.
First thing you do after a new install is run sa-update to download
a set of rules and those go into a seperate directory.
Do this:
spamassassin --lint -D 2>&1 | grep dir
And you should see things like:
Sep 16 14:21:39.457 [27354
On Tue, 17 Sep 2013, Abhijeet Rastogi wrote:
If you don't want to use the rules in the updates directory, why would you
even need to run sa-update?
I wish I could. SpamAssassin dies with the message as below if I don't
run sa-update or move the directory '/var/lib/spamassassin'.
die "config:
Hi guys,
I'm hoping someone can help me with an image spam. I haven't seen one
of these in a while, and I can't figure out how to catch them
effectively.
This one is probably now being caught by the RBLs, but I'm hoping
there's some other characteristic within the email that can be used to
block
On 9/16/2013 4:55 PM, Abhijeet Rastogi wrote:
If you don't want to use the rules in the updates directory, why would you
even need to run sa-update?
I wish I could. SpamAssassin dies with the message as below if I don't
run sa-update or move the directory '/var/lib/spamassassin'.
die "config: n
On 9/16/2013 4:19 PM, Abhijeet Rastogi wrote:
Hi Dave,
Thanks for the revelation. This clears a lot of things now. After I
disabled all the tests in 50_scores.cf, I was still seeing a lot of
CPU (a very heavily loaded server). This pretty much clears
everything.
You guys have been of commendabl
Hi Dave,
Thanks for the revelation. This clears a lot of things now. After I
disabled all the tests in 50_scores.cf, I was still seeing a lot of
CPU (a very heavily loaded server). This pretty much clears
everything.
You guys have been of commendable help. One last thing, so is there a
way or a h
Hi John,
I'm sure you're pretty clear on explaining it but as a newbie I'm
facing issues. My concern still exists. I could see loglines like:
Sep 16 14:41:51.607 [3999] dbg: rules: ran header rule __HAS_SENDER
==> got hit: ""
Sep 16 14:41:51.606 [3999] dbg: rules: ran header rule __HAS_TO
===
On Mon, 2013-09-16 at 23:50 +0530, Abhijeet Rastogi wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Did a
>
> $grep -inr __HAS_SENDER ./
>
> in the source. No hits, what-so-ever.
>
In my installation its in:
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.003002/updates_spamassassin_org/10_hasbase.cf
Martin
On Mon, 16 Sep 2013, Abhijeet Rastogi wrote:
Problem is, how do I know that a certain rule like __RCVD_IN_NJABL is
a base rule for others?
The two leading underscores in the rule name indicate that the rule, by
itself, is not assigned a score, thus, by itself, does not affect the
overall sco
Hi John,
Did a
$grep -inr __HAS_SENDER ./
in the source. No hits, what-so-ever.
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:37 PM, John Hardin wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Sep 2013, Abhijeet Rastogi wrote:
>
>> Hi John,
>>
>> I'm sure you're pretty clear on explaining it but as a newbie I'm
>> facing issues. My concern
On Mon, 16 Sep 2013, Abhijeet Rastogi wrote:
Hi John,
I'm sure you're pretty clear on explaining it but as a newbie I'm
facing issues. My concern still exists. I could see loglines like:
Sep 16 14:41:51.607 [3999] dbg: rules: ran header rule __HAS_SENDER
==> got hit: ""
Sep 16 14:41:51.606
Hi John,
Thanks for the reply. I could get the above said rule as a "meta" one.
Thanks for that. One more thing I was hoping you could help me with.
Can you explain as to what's the difference between rules under
"./rules" and under "./rulesrc/sandbox/" directory? The reason I want
to know this i
On Mon, 16 Sep 2013, Abhijeet Rastogi wrote:
Hi John,
Thanks for the reply. I could get the above said rule as a "meta" one.
Thanks for that.
Apologies if that came across as condescending, I was just trying to be
thorough.
One more thing I was hoping you could help me with.
Can you expl
Anyone have some examples of rules designed to catch words by content in
UTF-8 encoded messages? I'm doing some work on improving this.
Regards,
KAM
Hi guys,
I've already gone though the link
http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/Obvious-Disabling-some-RBL-URIBL-checks-td57047.html
which talks briefly about it.
Problem is, how do I know that a certain rule like __RCVD_IN_NJABL is
a base rule for others?
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:53 AM,
30 matches
Mail list logo
