Hi all,
I wanted to disable few RBLs & while doing that I observed that if I
want to just disable spamhaus, I've to actually disable
"__RCVD_IN_ZEN" after disabling the other spamhaus related checks like
"check_rbl_sub"..
How do I know that __RCVD_IN_ZEN is related to a check like
"RCVD_IN_SBL"?
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
> I've been trying to `teach' SA to spam from ham in my mail system.
>
> I've made it thru two main learning sessions where I ran around 450
> msgs (each time) thru sa-learn spam/ham and yet SA is still incapable
> of getting it right more than
I've been trying to `teach' SA to spam from ham in my mail system.
I've made it thru two main learning sessions where I ran around 450
msgs (each time) thru sa-learn spam/ham and yet SA is still incapable
of getting it right more than about 40 % or maybe less. Not sure how
to figure that out very
On Sun, 15 Sep 2013 21:15:46 -0400
Harry Putnam wrote:
> RW writes:
> > I had a look into it, and it seems that rounding is handled in an
> > unusual way. It starts by rounding to the nearest 0.1, and then
> > subtracts 0.1 if the result is non-spam to avoid the case of:
> >
> > X-Spam-Status: N
RW writes:
> On Sun, 15 Sep 2013 11:19:12 -0400
> Harry Putnam wrote:
[...]
>> I assumed it had something to do with rounding or something so I
>> increased the score to 4.1 to get that message to break the spam level
>> of 5.
>>
>> Now the same mail shows a total of 5.1
>>
>> 4.1 is shown fo
On Sun, 15 Sep 2013 11:19:12 -0400
Harry Putnam wrote:
> SA is letting mail thru as ham that should be spam apparently based on
> what is too low a score (for my mail) for URIBL_JP_SURBL which was
> 1.9 by default.
>
> I pushed it up to 4.
>
> But then I see a report that shows a total score of
Bart Schaefer writes:
> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
>>
>> 1) Does it matter that I have autolearn turned off in spamassassin
>> conf filt 'local.cf' while doing my sandbox work
>
> No, it doesn't. In fact it's probably better that way because SA
> won't waste time updat
On Sun, 2013-09-15 at 23:27 +0530, Blason rock wrote:
> I agree an wouldnt harm if I disable it as my smtp scanning is definitely
> running fine. What I was thinking about is does imap and pop3 AS scanning
> only needed for ISP kindaa environment? Since I do run small setup I know
> all my users ar
I agree an wouldnt harm if I disable it as my smtp scanning is definitely
running fine. What I was thinking about is does imap and pop3 AS scanning
only needed for ISP kindaa environment? Since I do run small setup I know
all my users are trusted and have AV running on their desktops. So they
wont
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
> 1) Does it matter that I have autolearn turned off in spamassassin
> conf filt 'local.cf' while doing my sandbox work
No, it doesn't. In fact it's probably better that way because SA
won't waste time updating the bayes database with the mi
On Sun, 2013-09-15 at 06:48 +, haman...@t-online.de wrote:
>
> >> Hi Guys,
> >>
> >> This may sound a basic questions but would like to know under what
> >> circumstances one should use IMAP/POP3 Anti Spam services? I do have AS for
> >> SMTP and is blokcing well but would like to know what c
Harry Putnam writes:
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
>
>> On 15.09.13 08:58, Harry Putnam wrote:
>>>How can I make SA include the 'X-Spam-Report:' header and report for
>>>all messages rather than just the spam messages?
>>>
>>>I have `report_safe 0' set but that only causes SA to includes the
SA is letting mail thru as ham that should be spam apparently based on
what is too low a score (for my mail) for URIBL_JP_SURBL which was
1.9 by default.
I pushed it up to 4.
But then I see a report that shows a total score of 4.9 when
4.0 is shown for URIBL_JP_SURBL
1.0 is shown for SPF_SOFTFA
On Sun, 15 Sep 2013, Jason Hirsh wrote:
OK went in and told FuzzyOcr not to scan jpeg and no more errors which is
logical as the jpegtopnm program is not executed
Hopefully this will end my build up of junk in /var/amavis which I attributed
to the failed scans
It is, however, a seriously
On 15.09.13 08:58, Harry Putnam wrote:
How can I make SA include the 'X-Spam-Report:' header and report for
all messages rather than just the spam messages?
I have `report_safe 0' set but that only causes SA to includes the
Report header for spam msgs.
Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
see doc
Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
> On 15.09.13 08:58, Harry Putnam wrote:
>>How can I make SA include the 'X-Spam-Report:' header and report for
>>all messages rather than just the spam messages?
>>
>>I have `report_safe 0' set but that only causes SA to includes the
>>Report header for spam msgs.
Blason rock skrev den 2013-09-15 07:37:
This may sound a basic questions but would like to know under what
circumstances one should use IMAP/POP3 Anti Spam services?
show link to a howto else its not a good question
I do have
AS for SMTP and is blokcing well but would like to know what
conse
On 15.09.13 08:58, Harry Putnam wrote:
How can I make SA include the 'X-Spam-Report:' header and report for
all messages rather than just the spam messages?
I have `report_safe 0' set but that only causes SA to includes the
Report header for spam msgs.
see doc for add_header option
--
Matus UH
OK went in and told FuzzyOcr not to scan jpeg and no more errors which is
logical as the jpegtopnm program is not executed
Hopefully this will end my build up of junk in /var/amavis which I attributed
to the failed scans
How can I make SA include the 'X-Spam-Report:' header and report for
all messages rather than just the spam messages?
I have `report_safe 0' set but that only causes SA to includes the
Report header for spam msgs.
Thomas Harold writes:
> On 9/13/2013 9:01 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
>> Kris Deugau writes:
>>
>>> From man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf:
>>>
>>> report_safe 0
>>
>> Thanks, I see I commented it out for some experiment several mnths
>> ago, and of course, forgot to uncomment.
>>
>
> (chuckles and mutt
21 matches
Mail list logo
