Thank you for the advice. I will attempt to follow it. For today, it's been
a long one and my stamina is not yet up to par. So more tomorrow perhaps.
joe a.
>>> On 9/6/2013 at 9:42 AM, Axb wrote:
if you need help, the best way is to:
- stay *concise* at all times - verbose blah can drive
Thanks for the leads.
>>> On 9/6/2013 at 10:05 AM, Kris Deugau wrote:
> Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
>. . .
> I read back a bit in the thread; you've definitely got something
> strange going on.
>
> I don't see a couple of bits of information that might help narrow it down:
>
> - which distribution
May be to give some background and from there please apply what works best for
you.
Linkedin do DMARC.org, this means all the emails sent from Linkedin
infrastructure will pass SPF (be with the mailfrom or helo strings) and be DKIM
signed. Furthermore the domain present in all the strings will
Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
> I'd like to revisit this, now that I have sufficient energy to devote to
> some hard sleuthing. Despite the
> fact that I was less than sharp (ahem) when first looking at this, I do
> feel I have covered all the obvious
> suspects.
>
> Some gentle nudges (or not) might g
if you need help, the best way is to:
- stay *concise* at all times - verbose blah can drive ppl away
- post config and then explain issue, *concisely*
- don't revive old threads.
- help ppl help you - their time is precious and few have unlimited
patience.
- keep it down to facts - if you have
I'd like to revisit this, now that I have sufficient energy to devote to some
hard sleuthing. Despite the
fact that I was less than sharp (ahem) when first looking at this, I do feel I
have covered all the obvious
suspects.
Some gentle nudges (or not) might get me rolling again. I suppose I
