>The idea is to charge emailers to send the emailee an email. The details are a
>little
>bit more complicated than that, but not much (explained below)."
This is a bad idea that just won't go away.
I wrote a white paper about it. It's ten years old, but nothing of any
importance
has changed:
On Sep 2, 2013, at 9:26 AM, Marcus Loxx wrote:
> Hello. My name is Marcus Loxx.
>
> First, please let me know if this is the correct way to post a question.
> Second, the question is more about spam filtering in general than
> SpamAssassin, but I couldn't think of a better place to post it. If
On Mon, 2 Sep 2013, Marcus Loxx wrote:
First, please let me know if this is the correct way to post a question.
Second, the question is more about spam filtering in general than
SpamAssassin, but I couldn't think of a better place to post it. If the Users
list is not a good place to post this
Thanks John,
> Standard Bayes questions:
>
> How do you train? Manually, automatically, or both?
Automatically. Recently I am manually training on Spam that I receive to
about 10 email addresses of our own like the ones shown but not sure how
much difference that is making. I THINK I used to ge
Hello. My name is Marcus Loxx.
First, please let me know if this is the correct way to post a question.
Second, the question is more about spam filtering in general than
SpamAssassin, but I couldn't think of a better place to post it. If the
Users list is not a good place to post this question,
On Mon, 2 Sep 2013, emailitis.com wrote:
Here's something else to look into:
/root/weeklymail/Sunmaillog:Aug 31 11:11:05 plesk3 spamd[11160]: spamd:
result: . 0 - BAYES_00
/root/weeklymail/Sunmaillog:Aug 31 14:21:34 plesk3 spamd[27015]: spamd:
result: Y 5 - BAYES_50
/root/weeklymail/Sunmaillo
