Hi,
I am receiving alot of spams pretending to be sending from USPS with a link to
download a virus. Has anyone come out with a rule to filter it?
Thanks
nic
On Aug 30, 2013, at 3:23 PM, "Matt" wrote:
> I am seeing tons of junk getting through claiming to be from the USPS
> about a missed delivery package. Anyone else seeing this?
Yes. I've got some decent rules for killing off the FedEx and RPS variants as
well. I'd rather not publish them as t
Plenty this week. I've just been sending to spamcop, but not a lot else.
Matt wrote:
>I am seeing tons of junk getting through claiming to be from the USPS
>about a missed delivery package. Anyone else seeing this?
>
>I am running SpamAssassin 3.3.1 and execute sa-update weekly.
I am seeing tons of junk getting through claiming to be from the USPS
about a missed delivery package. Anyone else seeing this?
I am running SpamAssassin 3.3.1 and execute sa-update weekly.
On Fri, 2013-08-30 at 14:25 +0100, RW wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Aug 2013 10:45:23 +0100
> Martin Gregorie wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2013-08-29 at 05:42 -0700, Neil Schwartzman wrote:
> > > On Aug 29, 2013, at 4:40 AM, RW wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 00:55:29 +0200
> > > > Michael Schaap wrote:
On Fri, 30 Aug 2013 10:45:23 +0100
Martin Gregorie wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-08-29 at 05:42 -0700, Neil Schwartzman wrote:
> > On Aug 29, 2013, at 4:40 AM, RW wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 00:55:29 +0200
> > > Michael Schaap wrote:
> > >> The "From:" header is at linkedin dot com, but the e
>> joe a.
>
> Well, now that I increased the size, they did too. However, now it slips
> thru without a word as to why.
> mime below (large section of fill words snipped to meet pastebin limit):
>
> http://pastebin.com/7hSxDZmg
>
>
> Should it at least tell me it skipped due to size?
OK, s
On Thu, 2013-08-29 at 05:42 -0700, Neil Schwartzman wrote:
> On Aug 29, 2013, at 4:40 AM, RW wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 00:55:29 +0200
> > Michael Schaap wrote:
> >
> >> On 29-Aug-2013 00:30, John Hardin wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 28 Aug 2013, Michael Schaap wrote:
> >>>
> Hi,
>
> >>