On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 08:07 -0400, Ian Turner wrote:
> > See where I am heading? Any chance your Bayes DB is completely borked?
> > sa-learn --dump magic
>
> Not sure what to do with this, but here you go:
> 0.000 0 29074 0 non-token data: nspam
> 0.000 0 4
Thank you both for those replies. That confirmed exactly what I was looking
for. Very helpful.
Karsten, concerning your note about sa-learn in different environments, I
did a few more tests and it looks like the dovecot antispam plugin does not
make any changes to the e-mail message and sa-learn t
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 05:15:19 +0200
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 21:53 -0400, Ian Turner wrote:
> > They are moderately low-scoring, sadly (I wouldn't have noticed
> > otherwise!), mainly due to bayes poison. A typical message looks
> > like this:
>
> Do you manually train th
On Thursday, July 25, 2013 05:15:19 AM Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 21:53 -0400, Ian Turner wrote:
> > They are moderately low-scoring, sadly (I wouldn't have noticed
> > otherwise!),
> > mainly due to bayes poison. A typical message looks like this:
> Do you manually train th
Thu 25.Jul'13 at 1:31:16 +0200, Karsten
Bräckelmann
[ ... ]
> NOTE: Be careful of using sa-learn in different environments or ways in
> parallel. For example via the dovecot anti-spam plugin, from a cron job
> harvesting mbox files, maildir, processed through f
