Re: Site Training via Redirect to a spam and/or ham mailbox

2013-07-11 Thread Mike Brown
W T Riker wrote: > I suspect someone has already done this somewhere but I can't seem to > come up with the right key words in my search. I'd like to set up spam > and ham mailboxes to which all my users can redirect/bounce errors for > Bayes training for the site. Then I can run sa-learn via cron

IP Blacklisting

2013-07-11 Thread Moein Sarvi
Hello is there anyway to blacklist an IP address?

Site Training via Redirect to a spam and/or ham mailbox

2013-07-11 Thread W T Riker
I suspect someone has already done this somewhere but I can't seem to come up with the right key words in my search. I'd like to set up spam and ham mailboxes to which all my users can redirect/bounce errors for Bayes training for the site. Then I can run sa-learn via cron against a single mailbox.

Re: spam problem Centos 6

2013-07-11 Thread Dejan Doder
Variable #@bypass_spam_checks(1) Should I place in brackets 0 or remove # to enable spam checks? On 7/11/13, Bowie Bailey wrote: > On 7/11/2013 4:23 PM, Dejan Doder wrote: >> Yes of course I have installed spamassassin > > I just asked since you did not list it as one of the rpms you installed.

Re: spam problem Centos 6

2013-07-11 Thread Bowie Bailey
On 7/11/2013 4:23 PM, Dejan Doder wrote: Yes of course I have installed spamassassin I just asked since you did not list it as one of the rpms you installed. -- Bowie

Re: spam problem Centos 6

2013-07-11 Thread Bowie Bailey
On 7/11/2013 4:22 PM, Dejan Doder wrote: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Amavisd When I send spam test I see in log CLEAN?!? Do not need spake daemon means I have to stop daemon? The CLEAN message in the log is coming from the ClamAV virus scanner. A spam test would be expected to show as clean

Re: spam problem Centos 6

2013-07-11 Thread Daniel McDonald
On 7/11/13 3:23 PM, "Dejan Doder" wrote: > Yes of course I have installed spamassassin Some of the spamassassin tuning parameters are amavisd specific, or overwritten by amavisd. In particular, the tag_level parameters in amavisd.conf is used set threshold scores for including headers, marking

Re: spam problem Centos 6

2013-07-11 Thread Dejan Doder
Yes of course I have installed spamassassin On 7/11/13, Dejan Doder wrote: > http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Amavisd > When I send spam test I see in log CLEAN?!? > Do not need spake daemon means I have to stop daemon? > > On 7/11/13, Bowie Bailey wrote: >> On 7/11/2013 3:32 PM, Dejan Doder wrote:

Re: spam problem Centos 6

2013-07-11 Thread Dejan Doder
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Amavisd When I send spam test I see in log CLEAN?!? Do not need spake daemon means I have to stop daemon? On 7/11/13, Bowie Bailey wrote: > On 7/11/2013 3:32 PM, Dejan Doder wrote: >> I installed this two rpm on Centos 6 >> >> amavisd-new.noarch 0:2.8.0-4.el64 >> pos

Re: spam problem Centos 6

2013-07-11 Thread Bowie Bailey
On 7/11/2013 3:32 PM, Dejan Doder wrote: I installed this two rpm on Centos 6 amavisd-new.noarch 0:2.8.0-4.el64 postfix-2.6.6-2.2.el6_1.i686 clamav-0.97.8-1.el6.i686 and dont see any errors in logs , antivirus works fine but spam NO If i receive spam message nothing happens I foolwed tutorial o

spam problem Centos 6

2013-07-11 Thread Dejan Doder
I installed this two rpm on Centos 6 amavisd-new.noarch 0:2.8.0-4.el64 postfix-2.6.6-2.2.el6_1.i686 clamav-0.97.8-1.el6.i686 and dont see any errors in logs , antivirus works fine but spam NO If i receive spam message nothing happens I foolwed tutorial on Centos Wiki..everything is the same.. Br

Re: Help eliminate false positive for Google Code notifications

2013-07-11 Thread Mike Brown
Axb wrote: > SARE rules are obsolete/unsupported/ancient/history/etc and shouldn't be > used. > Do yourself a favour and remove those files - will save you CPU cycles, > memory and lots of headaches. Heh, even easier than I thought. I think I had assumed that if I stopped fetching them, I would

Re: Help eliminate false positive for Google Code notifications

2013-07-11 Thread Axb
On 07/11/2013 06:09 PM, Mike Brown wrote: Google Code sends out notifications from @googlecode.com. These notifications have Message-ID headers that start with two digits and a dash, triggering this rule: SARE_MSGID_DDDASH Message-ID has ratware pattern (9-, 9$, 99-) The rule was proposed in 20

Help eliminate false positive for Google Code notifications

2013-07-11 Thread Mike Brown
Google Code sends out notifications from @googlecode.com. These notifications have Message-ID headers that start with two digits and a dash, triggering this rule: SARE_MSGID_DDDASH Message-ID has ratware pattern (9-, 9$, 99-) The rule was proposed in 2004: https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_m

Re: auto whitelist path

2013-07-11 Thread Moein Sarvi
T he AWL plugin in v310.pre was disabled! By enabling that and give enough permission it's working thanks

Re: auto whitelist path

2013-07-11 Thread Axb
On 07/11/2013 01:01 PM, Moein Sarvi wrote: warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping, in "/etc/spamassassin/local.cf": auto_whitelist_path /etc/mail/spamassassin/auto-whitelist is the AWL plugin enabled in v310.pre ? if yes please post the full output from - SA version - spamassassin --li

Re: auto whitelist path

2013-07-11 Thread Moein Sarvi
warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping, in "/etc/spamassassin/local.cf": auto_whitelist_path /etc/mail/spamassassin/auto-whitelist

Re: auto whitelist path

2013-07-11 Thread Axb
On 07/11/2013 12:53 PM, Moein Sarvi wrote: hi I can't set this command in local.cf and in --lint mode I face some error auto_whitelist_path /etc/mail/spamassassin/auto-whitelist "some error" is not very descriptive (helpful) What error?

auto whitelist path

2013-07-11 Thread Moein Sarvi
hi I can't set this command in local.cf and in --lint mode I face some error auto_whitelist_path /etc/mail/spamassassin/auto-whitelist

Re: SOLVED: Spamassassin with single link in body

2013-07-11 Thread Martin Gregorie
On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 22:37 -0700, Celene wrote: > On 7/6/2013 2:07 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote: > > On Sat, 2013-07-06 at 12:24 -0700, Celene wrote: > >> To be honest, I have never gotten any emails from people with only a > >> URL, unless they are spam, so this shouldn't be a problem. I just want >