SOLVED: Spamassassin with single link in body

2013-07-10 Thread Celene
On 7/6/2013 2:07 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote: > On Sat, 2013-07-06 at 12:24 -0700, Celene wrote: >> To be honest, I have never gotten any emails from people with only a >> URL, unless they are spam, so this shouldn't be a problem. I just want >> to match all emails that have a single link in the body

Re: From header required

2013-07-10 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Thu, 2013-07-11 at 00:40 +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote: > Karsten Bräckelmann skrev den 2013-07-10 23:46: > > > Doesn't seem to be hard to write afresh. Glimpse at the full headers, > > identify From: thingies, count 'em, and ding the bell if there's more > > than one... > > > > header __HAS_FR

Re: From header required

2013-07-10 Thread Benny Pedersen
Karsten Bräckelmann skrev den 2013-07-10 23:46: Doesn't seem to be hard to write afresh. Glimpse at the full headers, identify From: thingies, count 'em, and ding the bell if there's more than one... header __HAS_FROM ALL =~ /^From:\s/m tflags __HAS_FROM multiple could miss maxhits= on

Re: From header required

2013-07-10 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 23:46 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > Doesn't seem to be hard to write afresh. Glimpse at the full headers, > identify From: thingies, count 'em, and ding the bell if there's more > than one... > > header __HAS_FROM ALL =~ /^From:\s/m > tflags __HAS_FROM multiple >

Re: From header required

2013-07-10 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 22:41 +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote: > Andreas Schulze skrev den 2013-07-10 13:11: > > Are there SA Rules to score a missing or multiple from header? > > Does anybody do score these and is willing to share his SA rules? > > i have rules for this if i can find it again :) > >

Re: From header required

2013-07-10 Thread Benny Pedersen
RW skrev den 2013-07-10 14:57: Why not? A document can have more than one author. confusing https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6781 well i got confused, it another case from multiple from: and multiple date:

Re: From header required

2013-07-10 Thread Benny Pedersen
Andreas Schulze skrev den 2013-07-10 13:11: Every mail MUST have exact one From header (RFC5322, 3.6). Same RFC, Section 3.6.2 allow a from header contain a list of senders (Why ???) yes seems stupid In this case exact one sender header MUST be present and it MUST NOT a list. agree Are

Re: From header required

2013-07-10 Thread RW
On Wed, 10 Jul 2013 11:11:36 + Andreas Schulze wrote: > Hello, > > Every mail MUST have exact one From header (RFC5322, 3.6). > Same RFC, Section 3.6.2 allow a from header contain a list of > senders (Why ???) Why not? A document can have more than one author. > In this case exact one sende

Re: header field without value invalid?

2013-07-10 Thread RW
On Wed, 10 Jul 2013 10:50:51 + Andreas Schulze wrote: > > Hello, > > today I found messages with strage headers: they had an empty value. > > example: > From: ... > To: ... > X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: > Date: ... > > Is this against any rfc and could/should [not?] be rejected or used > to iden

From header required

2013-07-10 Thread Andreas Schulze
Hello, Every mail MUST have exact one From header (RFC5322, 3.6). Same RFC, Section 3.6.2 allow a from header contain a list of senders (Why ???) In this case exact one sender header MUST be present and it MUST NOT a list. Are there SA Rules to score a missing or multiple from header? Does an

header field without value invalid?

2013-07-10 Thread Andreas Schulze
Hello, today I found messages with strage headers: they had an empty value. example: From: ... To: ... X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Date: ... Is this against any rfc and could/should [not?] be rejected or used to identify spam? Thanks Andreas