Re: autowhitelist off but used?

2013-07-04 Thread Benny Pedersen
RW skrev den 2013-07-04 19:18: SA 3.1.1 That's nearly 7 years old; and probably the real source of your problem. and awl in this release have hardcoded /16 in awl code, where it later is freely set to /8 /16 /24 /32 ipranges where /24 is new perfered another reason to upgrade -- senders

Re: autowhitelist off but used?

2013-07-04 Thread RW
On Thu, 4 Jul 2013 08:45:47 -0400 1611mac wrote: > I inherited this site/email system in which autowhitelist had been > running but spam and ham never properly marked so I believe all email > to be "auto-whitelisted."\\ Autowhitelist doesn't actually whitelist. What it does is adjust the score t

Re: Spam via whitelists

2013-07-04 Thread Benny Pedersen
AndreaS Schamanek skrev den 2013-07-03 21:52: Only if I also add 172.31.38.210 (private address from a reserved block) it works as I expected it. Looks like I will use trusted_networks to save some CPU cycles but I'll also keep my meta rules. yep, rfc1700 is default listed in spamassassin,

autowhitelist off but used?

2013-07-04 Thread 1611mac
I inherited this site/email system in which autowhitelist had been running but spam and ham never properly marked so I believe all email to be "auto-whitelisted."\\ I turned auto-whitelist off with: use_auto_whitelist 0 However, I found this in a header: -4.4 AWL AWL: From: address is in the aut