On 7/2/2013 3:57 PM, 1611mac wrote:
My humblest apologies for a typo the version running is 3.3.1
NOT 3.1.1
Back on the list:
The code is:
if ($Net::DNS::VERSION < 0.34) {
warn("dns: Net::DNS version is $Net::DNS::VERSION, but need 0.34");
return $IS_DNS_AVAILABLE;
On 7/2/2013 1:56 PM, 1611mac wrote:
Hello,
SA (3.1.1) is running on my shared server account (HostGator) -
When I start SA from the cpanel I receive this warning:
Jul 2 12:37:19.789 [12601] warn: Argument "0.70_01" isn't numeric in
numeric lt (<) at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/Mail/S
On Sun, 30 Jun 2013 21:35:38 -0600
Amir 'CG' Caspi wrote:
> At 12:01 AM +0100 07/01/2013, RW wrote:
> >The sources of the body tokens is:
> >
> > $msgdata->{bayes_token_body} =
> >$msg->{msg}->get_visible_rendered_body_text_array();
> >
> > $msgdata->{bayes_token_inviz} =
> >$msg->{msg}->ge
Andreas Schamanek skrev den 2013-07-02 19:09:
Any better ideas?
disable dnseval plugin, the above meta is workaround that also works,
just remember most of them use spf/dkim, there is a dkim-repution
plugin, part of opendkim, one could start make repution reporting to
ones own opendkim serv
Hello,
SA (3.1.1) is running on my shared server account (HostGator) -
When I start SA from the cpanel I receive this warning:
Jul 2 12:37:19.789 [12601] warn: Argument "0.70_01" isn't numeric in numeric
lt (<) at /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/Mail/SpamAssassin/Dns.pm line
645.
Can any
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Andreas Schamanek
wrote:
> 2) What's currently more annoying are colleagues of mine operating
> large mail servers (tu-graz.ac.at and ethz.ch are 2 examples) who
> forward their former users' mail to external addresses without prior
> filtering. Thus, we see spam c
Hi SA fellows,
I sometimes disagree with whitelists such as DNSWL_MED,
chaosreigns.com/iprep/ or JMF-WHITE. There are 2 main issues:
1) Less often recently, but I did see freemail MTA IPs from Google,
Yahoo! and other big players showing up on whitelists. Considering the
amount of spam coming
