On 2013-05-28 13:43, Andrew Talbot wrote:
As some of you may have known from talking with me over the past few
weeks, I've been having a difficult time 'selling' my bosses on the
idea of Bayes; it simply doesn't seem to do anything new to them. But
looking at the data today, I came up with an i
Hey all -
I've got two questions:
1-
We're running Bayes and DCC on our server, and we've just been running
Bayes locally to see how well it works. It's been about three weeks now so
I finally really started poring over the results.
One thing I noticed that I thought was a particularly interest
Hallo there,
I looked at scoring for an email on an SA installation and noticed
differences between hand scanning with spamc and scanning with spamd. My
manually scanned email hit CLAMAV sane security, (ignore Bayes because
the user had Bayes process this and then asked me about this), whilst
Strange, when I run sa-update or sa-compile the file timing.log is
generated, but when I run spamassassin-t (even with root or spam user)
does not
Em 27-05-2013 18:04, Rejaine Monteiro escreveu:
Yes, I do that
#spamassassin -D plugin --cf="loadplugin HitFreqsRuleTiming
/etc/mail/spamass
On Mon, 27 May 2013 18:02:10 -0400
dar...@chaosreigns.com top-posted:
> On 05/27, Rejaine Monteiro wrote:
> > Hello guys,
> >
> > There are still some active rules update channel? Sare and Open
> > looks that are no longer available...
> >
> > "The SARE rules are broken to the point of being har
