Am 14.05.2013 00:40, schrieb Bill Polhemus:
> If this isn't the correct place for this, please excuse the faux pas.
>
> I've added a couple of network ranges covering "known good" networks like
> places of work, to the -i option for spamass-milter.
>
> The spamass-milter man-page says this wil
If this isn't the correct place for this, please excuse the faux pas.
I've added a couple of network ranges covering "known good" networks like
places of work, to the -i option for spamass-milter.
The spamass-milter man-page says this will cause sa-m to "ignore messages if
the originating IP"
On 05/13/2013 08:14 PM, Dave Pooser wrote:> I'm about to build a couple
of frontend servers at $DAYJOB and wondering
> 1) if a SpamAssassin 3.4 release date is on the horizon
> 2) if not, is there anything useful a non-Perl-hacker can do to help
> accelerate that release date
> 3) what advantage
--On Monday, May 13, 2013 1:14 PM -0500 Dave Pooser
wrote:
I'm about to build a couple of frontend servers at $DAYJOB and wondering
1) if a SpamAssassin 3.4 release date is on the horizon
2) if not, is there anything useful a non-Perl-hacker can do to help
accelerate that release date
3) what
On Mon, 13 May 2013 22:18:16 +0200
Benny Pedersen wrote:
> sorry it was not mean to be so, i just like to learn more about why
> bayes is better then other digest solotions already shared in
> spamassassin
Bayes tends to be a little bit harder to fool than digests. Although
fuzzy digests do the
Kevin A. McGrail skrev den 2013-05-13 15:14:
i think David missed one more word, no share ?
Perhaps but David was debating the usability of a shared database and
offered his input as a commercial vendor as well as access to his
concepts to the development team. I've always like MIMEDefang an
I'm about to build a couple of frontend servers at $DAYJOB and wondering
1) if a SpamAssassin 3.4 release date is on the horizon
2) if not, is there anything useful a non-Perl-hacker can do to help
accelerate that release date
3) what advantages 3.4 has vs 3.3.2 and sa_update
4) what the experience
On Sat, 11 May 2013 16:28:16 +0200
Benny Pedersen wrote:
> i think David missed one more word, no share ?
OK, here's my point. In 2004, I was as skeptical as most others on this
list that a shared Bayes database would be useful. Then I read the USENIX
LISA '04 paper by Blosser and Josephsen th
On 5/11/2013 10:28 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Bob Proulx skrev den 2013-05-11 01:06:
No sale.
Your database sounds just simply wonderful. Where can I download this
database so that I can start using it?
i think David missed one more word, no share ?
Perhaps but David was debating the usabil
