Hi All... Alain, no need to confirm the message body, it was the compromise
campaign.
iPhone truncated the message; couldn't see the full deal until after I'd sent
my reply.
Thanks all--
Mkr
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 29, 2013, at 10:00 PM, "Margot Romary"
wrote:
> Hi Alain... Apologies f
Hi Alain... Apologies for the delayed reply. I'm mid-move cross country with
my family and have limited access to email.
Living Social, stemming from their recent internal compromise, sent
notifications of the breach to any address from which they'd had a touchpoint
in the past. They hit a *l
In article <517f122c.3050...@trimble.com> you write:
>I agree. We've seen a huge increase in ".pw" email - 100% spam
>
>I see one antispam vendor is telling its customers to just block
>anything containing .pw references - I'm rapidly warming to the idea...
You can report them to ab...@registry.pw
I agree. We've seen a huge increase in ".pw" email - 100% spam
I see one antispam vendor is telling its customers to just block
anything containing .pw references - I'm rapidly warming to the idea...
http://www.fortantispam.com/top-level-pw-domain-source-of-spam-outbreak/
--
Cheers
Jason Haar
Matus,
A couple of questions. If I created 2 IMAP email users, "ham" and "spam",
and had users participating by sending their good/bad emails to these, would
it matter if they moved the emails there in Outlook 2010, or would copy be
okay? In Outlook 2010, if you right-click the email and select
On 29.04.13 10:14, Rick Cone wrote:
Actually, I have already partially done something like this, but I've been
told it's not enough. I created 1 special email user called "junk", and we
use it as IMAP type, and participating users move their SPAM to the "Junk
E-mail" folder of "junk". I then ha
On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 12:46 -0400, Alex wrote:
> First, asking the users to look in the headers (or body) to find an
> unsubscribe link, and telling them to make sure it's "confirmed" just
> doesn't happen. They just want it blocked.
>
Did they subscribe to the list? Then tell 'em to get a clue an
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013, Alex wrote:
What if it's a "semi-legit" newsletter that user has not subscribed into?
A newsletter that does unconfirmed subscriptions is not even *semi*-legit.
Treat them as spam. Write a rule for any identifying headers, and report
them to URIBL.
I asked about this is
Hi,
>> What if it's a "semi-legit" newsletter that user has not subscribed into?
>
> A newsletter that does unconfirmed subscriptions is not even *semi*-legit.
>
> Treat them as spam. Write a rule for any identifying headers, and report
> them to URIBL.
I asked about this issue on the list some t
Matas,
Thanks for the reply...
Actually, I have already partially done something like this, but I've been
told it's not enough. I created 1 special email user called "junk", and we
use it as IMAP type, and participating users move their SPAM to the "Junk
E-mail" folder of "junk". I then have "s
Hello Kris,
Friday, April 12, 2013, 4:23:55 PM, you wrote:
KD> I see the score showing a little less in the current update:
KD> score RP_MATCHES_RCVD -0.551 -1.344 -0.551 -1.344
Since gone back up :(
score RP_MATCHES_RCVD -0.553 -2.438 -0.553 -2.438
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
What if it's a "semi-legit" newsletter that user has not subscribed
into?
A newsletter that does unconfirmed subscriptions is not even *semi*-legit.
Treat them as spam. Write a rule for any identifying headers, and report
them to URIBL.
--
On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 13:06 +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> What if it's a "semi-legit" newsletter thatuserhas not subscribed into?
> I have seen receiving this kind of e-mails from some "world saviours"
> repeatedly to many addressess that did not subscribe...
>
So have I, though not from '
On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 07:46 +0530, Blason rock wrote:
Recently I observed that users started receiving those newsletters
kinda mail. May be sombody internally subscribing it and that is why
they do receive. However as a general concept would like to know if
such mails can be stopped or is there a
On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 07:46 +0530, Blason rock wrote:
> Hey fellas,
>
> Recently I observed that users started receiving those newsletters
> kinda mail. May be sombody internally subscribing it and that is why
> they do receive. However as a general concept would like to know if
> such mails can b
On 28.04.13 10:31, Rick Cone wrote:
I have spamassassin available for use in a POP environment with Outlook
2010. We don't use IMAP. How would someone recommend getting the SPAM and
HAM information to sa-learn?
On 29.04.13 09:10, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
start using IMAP...
Well, sorr
On 28.04.13 10:31, Rick Cone wrote:
I have spamassassin available for use in a POP environment with Outlook
2010. We don't use IMAP. How would someone recommend getting the SPAM and
HAM information to sa-learn?
start using IMAP...
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fant
17 matches
Mail list logo
