On Fri, 26 Apr 2013 02:03:30 +0200
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 13:57 +0100, RW wrote:
> > I was just looking at the ASM plugin and it defines tags, but not a
> > metadata "pseudo-header". With other plugins, header tests run
> > against that metadata header.
>
> Doh! Spot o
On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 18:45 -0400, Andrew Talbot wrote:
> I like your point about the portmanteau rules (and I award you two
> Points for using one of my favorite words in a new - yet appropriate -
> manner!).
>
:-)
> I never thought about scoring each rule as a 0.001 or something really
> low
On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 13:57 +0100, RW wrote:
> I was just looking at the ASM plugin and it defines tags, but not a
> metadata "pseudo-header". With other plugins, header tests run against
> that metadata header.
Doh! Spot on.
The metadata pseudo-headers are missing. Header rules can match against
On Thu, 25 Apr 2013, Andrew Talbot wrote:
I never thought about scoring each rule as a 0.001 or something really low
then tying them all together with meta-rules.
Best practice is to define them as __SUBRULES, which don't score at all,
and then tie those together in metas.
The only reason t
Hi, Martin -
Thank you for your response.
I like your point about the portmanteau rules (and I award you two Points
for using one of my favorite words in a new - yet appropriate - manner!).
I never thought about scoring each rule as a 0.001 or something really low
then tying them all toget
--On Thursday, April 25, 2013 11:19 PM +0200 Karsten Bräckelmann
wrote:
On Fri, 2013-04-26 at 01:10 +0530, Blason rock wrote:
Yeah that was good source of information. Or rather let me rephrase
the question, if anyone has tried prerbl with zimbra? I m sure there
are usrers who might have imp
On Fri, 2013-04-26 at 01:10 +0530, Blason rock wrote:
> Yeah that was good source of information. Or rather let me rephrase
> the question, if anyone has tried prerbl with zimbra? I m sure there
> are usrers who might have implemented prerbl with postfix in zimbra,
> are there any?
Color me ignor
> On 4/25/2013 11:55 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
> ...
>
> My understanding is that it's better (with respect to performance and
> atomicity) to attempt the INSERT and have it fail than to check if the
> ID/token combination already exists and UPDATE it if it does.
Please note that it wou
On Thu, 25 Apr 2013, Frank Gadegast wrote:
And SA is doing it right, to remove all X-Spam-lines
before its starting, so that spammer cannot trick SA.
And whatever line is inserted by ASN.pm, it needs
to be stripped too, and thats why its programmed
like it is.
But I have no still no idea how t
Yeah that was good source of information. Or rather let me rephrase the
question, if anyone has tried prerbl with zimbra? I m sure there are
usrers who might have implemented prerbl with postfix in zimbra, are there
any?
On 26 Apr 2013 01:00, "Tony Nelson" wrote:
> Recently there was a good thr
Recently there was a good thread about postscreen and rbl. I just updated my
config and have seen a decent improvement.
Here is the starter message:
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2013-04/0468.html
Hope this helps,
Tony
From: Raymond Dijkxhoorn [mailto:raym...@prolocation.ne
Hai!
Since a couple of years they have something thats called google. :)
The first hit on 'rbl and postfix' gives:
http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/postfix-spam-filtering-with-blacklists-howto.html
Thanks,
Raymond Dijkxhoorn, Prolocation
Op 25 apr. 2013 om 21:20 heeft Blason rock het volgende
g
So any clue or if anyone has done it with postfix?
On 26 Apr 2013 00:45, "Raymond Dijkxhoorn" wrote:
> Hai!
>
> Grin.
>
> Your MTA most likely supports RBL's.
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond Dijkxhoorn, Prolocation
>
> Op 25 apr. 2013 om 21:09 heeft Blason rock het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> Hi folks,
>
>
Hai!
Grin.
Your MTA most likely supports RBL's.
Thanks,
Raymond Dijkxhoorn, Prolocation
Op 25 apr. 2013 om 21:09 heeft Blason rock het volgende
geschreven:
> Hi folks,
>
> Curious to know if i can implement prerbl with SA? What i mean is with SA as
> soon as sombody connects on port 25 S
Hi folks,
Curious to know if i can implement prerbl with SA? What i mean is with SA
as soon as sombody connects on port 25 SA should check if the connected
host is part of any RBL and then process connection accordingly.
On 4/25/2013 11:55 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
>> wrote:
>>> I don't think so... IIRC the "REPLACE INTO" deletes existing record and
>>> inserts new one, does not update existing. This caused some issues
>>> for me
>>> some ~10 year
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
wrote:
I don't think so... IIRC the "REPLACE INTO" deletes existing record and
inserts new one, does not update existing. This caused some issues for me
some ~10 years ago, so i switched to the update or insert.
On 25.04.13 16:36, Matthias
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
wrote:
> I don't think so... IIRC the "REPLACE INTO" deletes existing record and
> inserts new one, does not update existing. This caused some issues for me
> some ~10 years ago, so i switched to the update or insert.
>
"REPLACE INTO" is a
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 16:45:42 +0200
Frank Gadegast wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I like to set extra score on mail coming from some ASns
> using the asn.pm
>
> Lets say I like to reject all mail from BELPAK.BY I wrote
>
> header LOCAL_AS6697 X-Spam-ASN =~ / AS6697 /
> describe LOCAL_AS6697 Sende
On 24.04.13 17:01, psychobyte wrote:
in the bayes case, the table is bayes_token and indeed
Mail::SpamAssassin::BayesStore::SQL is INSERTING into the table via
_put_tokens().
my $insertsql = "INSERT INTO bayes_token
(id, token, spam_count, ham_count, atime)
Christian Recktenwald wrote:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:18:43AM +0200, Frank Gadegast wrote:
And SA surely strips all head-lines starting with "X-Spam-" before
its doing anything.
In Mail/SpamAssassin.pm there is some special handling of
"X-Spam-" prefixed mail headers.
So it's really not abou
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:18:43AM +0200, Frank Gadegast wrote:
> And SA surely strips all head-lines starting with "X-Spam-" before
> its doing anything.
In Mail/SpamAssassin.pm there is some special handling of
"X-Spam-" prefixed mail headers.
So it's really not about subsequent dashes.
--
Ch
Christian Recktenwald wrote:
I ran some tests which indicate one may not have subsequent '-' after
'X-' in header lines:
Thats a great test, many thnx for it.
It simply indicates, that ASN.pm is running nearly at first, before
SA does its messurements.
And SA surely strips all head-lines star
23 matches
Mail list logo
