>>> On 4/21/2013 at 7:56 AM, "Joe Acquisto-j4" wrote:
>>
>> --
>> John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
>> jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
>
> Thanks. This has cleared most of my fog.
>
> I had chosen to forward as i
On Sun, 21 Apr 2013 19:47:49 +0100
John Horne wrote:
> > That's the received wisdom, but I've never seen a definitive reason
> > why. Compiled rules are intended to co-exit with non-compiled rules,
> > and from my limited testing, rules behave correctly when they are
> > added, removed or modifie
On Sun, 21 Apr 2013, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
Thanks. This has cleared most of my fog.
I had chosen to forward as it seemed simpler at the time, g
On Thu, 2013-04-18 at 14:08 +0100, RW wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 21:40:33 +0100
> John Horne wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > We are running SpamAssassin 3.3.2 on a CentOS 5.9 server. sa-update
> > runs via a daily cron job, and we have modified that to run
> > sa-compile as well. However, there are
On 20.04.13 15:18, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
Looks as if I misunderstood something here. I thought it was OK to forward,
as an attachment and SA/Bayes would
"figure it out".I did think that curious, but, hey, what do I know?
That's obvious now . . . Anyway it made it easier for
me to feed
On Sat, 20 Apr 2013 10:38:57 -0400
Jeff Mincy wrote:
> Bayes uses the message id from the email message to remember which
> messages it has seen. If you are really emailing the messages then
> you are getting a new message-id which is then learned. You need to
> train on the unadulterated origi
>
> --
> John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
> jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
Thanks. This has cleared most of my fog.
I had chosen to forward as it seemed simpler at the time, given the SA
learning curve. Still on
