I run spamassassin under linux using the Maia Mailguard system. I've been
trying to tweak the score for RP_MATCHES_RCVD because the default values let
too much spam through.
However, when I insert the following into /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf,
update maia & restart amavisd:
score RP_MATCH
On 4/16/13 2:59 PM, "Ben Johnson" wrote:
>Are there any normal circumstances under which Bayes tests are not run?
Yes, if USE_BAYES = 0 is included in the local.cf file.
>
> If not, are there circumstances under which Bayes tests are run but
> their results are not included in the message he
Apologies for resurrecting the thread, but I never did receive a
response to this particular aspect of the problem (asked on Jan 18,
2013, 8:51 AM). This is probably because I replied to my own post before
anyone else did, and changed the subject slightly.
We are being hammered pretty hard with sp
Alex wrote:
> I can understand adjusting the values slightly for each user's
> particular situation, but doesn't it generally throw off the balance of
> how the email as a whole is weighted when you adjust values in that way?
If a rule is causing undesired behaviour (for this particular rule,
fals
On 16/04/13 14:28, Ned Slider wrote:
In an ideal world, yes. But I suspect the SA auto-generated scoring
system is far from an ideal world due to the limited number of
contributors to the spam/ham corpus and the fact that your or my mail
streams might not accurately reflect those contributed to
On 16/04/13 00:07, Alex wrote:
Hi,
But I stand by my local.cf entry reducing RP_MATCHES_RCVD to an advisory
-0.001; it may be useful in combination with other rules, but I don't
think it's valuable enough on its own to have even -0.5 points. I can't
say I've seen any evidence in the mail s
