On Mon, 8 Apr 2013 16:02:27 -0600
Bob Proulx wrote:
> Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > Unfortunately, no. While procmail implements some flavor of
> > "extended" Regular Expressions, there are still quite some
> > differences to other regex engines,
I got sufficiently fed up with procmail that I
Hi,
My hope is to not reinvent the wheel here, but at the moment the sql
backend is the single point of failure.
>>>
>>>
>>> Look into MariaDB/Galera cluster as a mysql drop in replacement.
>>>
>>> http://blog.mariadb.org/mariadb-galera-cluster-5-5-29-stable-ga-released/
>>
>> I'm also v
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > * ^X-Spam-Level: \*{10}
>
> Unfortunately, no. While procmail implements some flavor of "extended"
> Regular Expressions, there are still quite some differences to other
> regex engines, like egrep's or PCRE. Most notably, the repetition
> opera
On Sun, 2013-04-07 at 21:44 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
[ Bunch of good advise snipped. ]
> :0
> * ^X-Spam-Level: \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*
> devnull/
>
> Since procmail uses Extended Regular Expressions there is one more
> optimization I would make. I wouldn't list out every star. It gets
> har
On 4/8/2013 1:06 PM, Walter Hurry wrote:
On Mon, 08 Apr 2013 10:52:11 +0200, Andrzej A. Filip wrote:
I would suggest redirecting such messages to another folder/maildir.
The folder should auto-purge old messages (e.g. older than 30 days).
Shit does happen. I remember at least one case in which
On Mon, 08 Apr 2013 10:52:11 +0200, Andrzej A. Filip wrote:
> I would suggest redirecting such messages to another folder/maildir.
> The folder should auto-purge old messages (e.g. older than 30 days).
> Shit does happen. I remember at least one case in which mailing list
> (ham) thread about spam
On 04/08/2013 05:21 PM, Alex wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Axb wrote:
On 04/08/2013 02:32 PM, Per-Erik Persson wrote:
Both for performance and stability reasons I need to setup multiple
sqlbackends for spamassassin.
I have found some bits about the perl failover module, postgres
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Axb wrote:
> On 04/08/2013 02:32 PM, Per-Erik Persson wrote:
>>
>> Both for performance and stability reasons I need to setup multiple
>> sqlbackends for spamassassin.
>> I have found some bits about the perl failover module, postgres
>> clustering and patches
On 04/08/2013 02:32 PM, Per-Erik Persson wrote:
Both for performance and stability reasons I need to setup multiple
sqlbackends for spamassassin.
I have found some bits about the perl failover module, postgres
clustering and patches to spamassassin.
Does anyone have a working solution to share w
Both for performance and stability reasons I need to setup multiple
sqlbackends for spamassassin.
I have found some bits about the perl failover module, postgres
clustering and patches to spamassassin.
Does anyone have a working solution to share with multiple spamassassin
servers accessing multip
On 04/08/2013 05:12 AM, Thomas Cameron wrote:
> [...]
> I want to delete any spam that scores over 10, though. I believe that I
> should insert a new rule between the first and second, and I want to use
> the X-Spam-Level header. But since it uses asterisks, which are
> interpreted as regex wildcar
11 matches
Mail list logo
