Re: Interpreting an Authentication-Results: header ?

>> You'd need to configure it to tell which authids to accept, perhaps >> defaulting to the host name of the machine SA is running on since >> that's a likely default for the authid. > >Agreed. I think it would also - at the trust boundary - need a filter before >the DKIM/SPF verifier that adds the

Re: Interpreting an Authentication-Results: header ?

* John Levine : > >IIRC there isn't at the moment. One thought that comes to mind immediately: > > > >If there were it should not be enabled by default or others will try to forge > >the results. It should only be enabled if a "trust boundary" > > has

Re: Interpreting an Authentication-Results: header ?

>IIRC there isn't at the moment. One thought that comes to mind immediately: > >If there were it should not be enabled by default or others will try to forge >the results. It should only be enabled if a "trust boundary" > has been established. The >do